In Reply to: Re: Please explain "listener's fatigue" posted by Silver on May 14, 2000 at 10:23:36:
Still can't stick to the topic can you?You are actually troller your self. As I said, do not compare the CD wiht a supposed-to-be good LP. Why do you do this, is it because Harry pearson recommended it to you?ROFLMAO.
Yes, because HP tell me too via our psychic connection. His audio kharma radiates from LI to NY and has me under his spell. Doesn't it reach Japan? Too bad because you might learn something. But let's get it straight: my name is Myles Astor, not Harry Pearson.
Now lets look at the facts. You made the claim that the Starker CD sounded better than the LP. You used a shitty LP mastering. You use a crappy analog front end. When pressed, you couldn't back up your claims so you try your best to obfuscate the story.
The reason you use the original mastering is because it's the proper way to perform such a comparison. When you compare, you compare apples with apples, not apples with oranges. The best pressing vs the best pressing or else why? Why didn't you just just compare the CD to the cassette tape? I'm sure the CD sounds better too. Kinda like saying you're smarter than a retarded person. Are you that incredibly dense not to understand?
And you're trying to further obsfuscate the facts by knocking my mag won't get you any further either since as usual, you don't know what you're talking about as you've proved above.
Myles B. Astor
Publisher
Ultimate Audio
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Please explain "listener's fatigue" - Myles B. Astor 05:13:36 05/15/00 (3)
- Re: Please explain "listener's fatigue" - Silver 08:21:03 05/15/00 (2)
- Re: Please explain "listener's fatigue" - Myles B. Astor 09:15:10 05/15/00 (1)
- Re: Please explain "listener's fatigue" - Silver 09:32:53 05/15/00 (0)
You can not post to an archived thread.