|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: ROTFLOL posted by Pat D on January 16, 2007 at 13:35:40:
How idiotic your anaylis is. AMAZING.>OK, since you insist, I'll move on from meta-discusion.
Audiohobby has already shown your merry-go-round trip.Now that is funny coming from one of two guys who seem to live on the proverbial merry go round.
>Now, I shall show some important confusions and instances of changing your ground.
LOL you have already shown that you are completely confused. anything more would be redundant.
>AS
“So I will not change my preferences to suit your measured standards of excellence.â€â€œOur perceptions are not there to serve the measurements.â€
>COMMENT
Audiohobby has not proposed that anyone’s *preferences* for equipment should suit measured standards of excellence.And yet he argues with my every post. My assertiuons are right but you guys agrue with me anyways? Dude you guys live on that merry go round.
>This amounts to a straw man and a blatant misrepresentation.
Wrong.I represent my views and I represent them accurately and consistantly. You guys just can't deal with it but you have to argue anyway because you live on that objectivist/subjectivist merry go round. You can't deal with anything other than the old round and round traditional arguements so you don't know how to deal with my assertions.> (I also should point out that preferences for equipment are likely to be based on lots of other things besides measurements and sound.)
Irrelevant, as usual. I was only refering to the listening experience. Funny you would burn a strawman while crying about me doing so.
>AS
“measurements are meaningless unless they corolate [sic] with the listening experience. that is what i have been telling you this whole time.â€>COMMENT
Now, you change your ground and talk about the *listening experience*, which is a very different from preference for equipment.God you are dumb. No they are not.
> Listening experiences are affected by so very many things (including the music!) both objective and subjective that it cannot be correlated with measurements.And this makes them mutually exclusive to preferences how?
>As audiohobby has very sensibly pointed out “afterall it is the component that is being measured not your perception,†and the same would go for your “listening experience.†Your listening experiences will vary greatly whether the equipment is changed or not. So you are truly confused.
No you are truly confused. You can not see the simple task of seperating the proverbial signal from the noise in the "listening experience.' That is your shortcoming not mine. No wonder guys like you dig measurements, they are simple, like you
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Amazing - Analog Scott 14:16:53 01/16/07 (2)
- I said you misrepresented audiohobby's views, not your own. . . - Pat D 20:28:16 01/16/07 (1)
- . Yes you do love to make things up about me. - Analog Scott 22:22:58 01/16/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
