In Reply to: Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine posted by Greg Ewing on January 9, 2007 at 14:07:26:
> But their views on all things audio are almost identical.Remarkably, their views on technical matters are also almost identical with everyone else who has invested the time to understand the scientific basis of sound, sound perception and audio equipment. Weird isn't it. Do you think there might be something in this science stuff?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - andy19191 14:22:31 01/09/07 (40)
- Yeah, Science, what you dun for me lately? - tomservo 11:30:19 01/12/07 (0)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - thetubeguy1954 11:17:24 01/10/07 (1)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - 3fd 14:09:53 01/12/07 (0)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - morricab 01:15:15 01/10/07 (2)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - andy19191 10:21:49 01/10/07 (1)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - morricab 15:05:12 01/10/07 (0)
- Well now - E-Stat 18:07:00 01/09/07 (5)
- Re: Well now - andy19191 21:48:08 01/09/07 (4)
- You may be right after all... - E-Stat 17:38:39 01/10/07 (3)
- Re: You may be right after all... - andy19191 01:22:05 01/11/07 (2)
- Re: woofers - E-Stat 04:42:28 01/11/07 (0)
- Thanks for the non-answer to your generalization - E-Stat 04:37:28 01/11/07 (0)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - kurt s 14:51:02 01/09/07 (27)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - andy19191 15:51:57 01/09/07 (26)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - morricab 01:28:11 01/10/07 (0)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - andy19191 14:07:08 01/10/07 (2)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - morricab 15:00:04 01/10/07 (1)
- Re: The Audio Critic is now a free Web 'zine - andy19191 01:03:24 01/11/07 (0)
- Wow! Thanks very much for those two - Sordidman 08:36:26 01/10/07 (0)
- "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - kurt s 16:15:40 01/09/07 (15)
- Re: "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - andy19191 23:31:10 01/09/07 (3)
- Re: "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - kurt s 08:31:16 01/10/07 (2)
- Re: "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - andy19191 01:36:15 01/11/07 (0)
- You figured out andy pretty quickly... - mkuller 20:40:16 01/10/07 (0)
- Re: "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - bjh 20:19:54 01/09/07 (10)
- Re: "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - andy19191 23:43:34 01/09/07 (9)
- Re: One contradictory valid observation will force an adopted model to be discarded. - jensw 13:52:18 01/10/07 (0)
- Re: "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - Tom Schuman 04:37:02 01/10/07 (6)
- Re: "Opinions? Science does not have opinions." - andy19191 11:38:24 01/10/07 (5)
- Sounds like you're talking about 'scientism'...(nt) - mkuller 20:43:18 01/10/07 (0)
- How are we defining the term "science" here? - Thomas Martens 12:12:33 01/10/07 (3)
- Re: How are we defining the term "science" here? - andy19191 01:54:13 01/11/07 (0)
- Not to mention ... - bjh 12:52:30 01/10/07 (1)
- Let me add - jensw 00:58:03 01/11/07 (0)
- Amen! nt - bjh 04:08:57 01/10/07 (0)
- Science changes all the time - it's not static...(nt) - mkuller 15:58:13 01/09/07 (4)
- Re: Science changes all the time - it's not static...(nt) - andy19191 23:26:36 01/09/07 (3)
- That's as ludicrous a claim - E-Stat 18:12:38 01/10/07 (0)
- So science is all finished? LOL!...(nt) - mkuller 11:35:52 01/10/07 (0)
- Re: Science changes all the time - it's not static...(nt) - morricab 01:07:37 01/10/07 (0)