|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: MQA is not touted by JA and RH as a "small improvement". posted by Rick W on December 13, 2017 at 13:26:40:
...if the car salesperson says that this Chevy Malibu is going to blow the Ford Focus out of the water for the same price, and it it's only a bit better, aren't you going to buy it anyway?
Will you really care what the salesperson, or the guy on the commercial says?I don't have a dog in the hunt - analog guy - but many of us do have legitimate concerns which we are bringing forward.
My question has nothing to do with any claims made for the technology, and I believe that I never implied that it did. My question was simply, to make it beneficial, and worth owning, why would it have to be on order of magnitude better. Obviously, I am asking from the perspective of a consumer, not one that has a vested interest in the claims of magazine writers or the authors of the technology.
Edits: 12/13/17 12/13/17 12/13/17 12/13/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- So Rick, to give an example..... - viridian 14:12:24 12/13/17 (5)
- Hmm, kinda doubt JA and RH would appreciate being equated with car salesmen :-) - Rick W 14:50:26 12/13/17 (3)
- I do think that they have vested interests, but my question was... - viridian 15:21:23 12/13/17 (2)
- RE: I do think that they have vested interests, but my question was... - Bruce from DC 15:13:42 12/14/17 (1)
- RE: I do think that they have vested interests, but my question was... - John Atkinson 04:17:14 12/16/17 (0)
- Exactly...(nt) - mkuller 14:32:59 12/13/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
