Home Inmate Central

Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome.

And yet considering the case you make

The net result is still the same: more $$$ in the beneficiary's pocket/fewer $$$ to gubmint. Since common position on revenues is that the gubmint doesn't create wealth but only redistributes it after taking its cut, the "wealth" that the gubmint didn't receive from the "beneficiary" as a result of its tax breaks will come from either reductions in gubmint wealth elsewhere and/or increased taxes on someone other than the beneficiary. That some political philosophies suggest the "job creation class" deserves gubmint subsidies indicates that there's trouble in free-market-capitalism-city. It's clear we're not changing any minds here so I don't believe there's really anything more to discuss. Later!


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Parts Connexion  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.