In Reply to: Since DBTs are so great, why then do precious few audio manufacturers ever mention them? posted by E-Stat on June 6, 2006 at 11:07:50:
HiI am a manufacturer (I design the stuff anyway), our products are loudspeakers in commercial sound not home hifi however, I can offer a few thoughts.
It is ONLY when a mfr thinks they will win that such events take place.
Mfr’s are in business to sell product, marketing teaches (for example in the 22 immutable laws of marketing) that it does not matter how good the product actually is, it is the perception that counts.
AS the DBT of amplifiers and speaker cables normally don’t show much or any distinguishable difference, popularizing such tests is NOT something an amplifier or cable company is likely to do.
Come to think of it, I would bet that many folks could even be down right hostile to the idea if their income was jeopardized by such findings.Tom Danley
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Since DBTs are so great, why then do precious few audio manufacturers ever mention them? - tomservo 11:37:47 06/06/06 (15)
- Telling the truth won't win you many friends around this place - Soundmind 19:25:18 06/06/06 (0)
- Re: Since DBTs are so great, why then do precious few audio manufacturers ever mention them? - Dan Banquer 11:50:59 06/06/06 (10)
- Do you actually *know* anyone - E-Stat 11:53:53 06/06/06 (9)
- Re: Do you actually *know* anyone - Dan Banquer 11:59:05 06/06/06 (8)
- Sorry to hear that - E-Stat 12:10:16 06/06/06 (7)
- They got there whole this time, I hope? - real_jj 12:25:00 06/06/06 (2)
- Yes, thank you! - E-Stat 12:42:48 06/06/06 (1)
- Heh... - real_jj 13:15:38 06/06/06 (0)
- Wow! You've been in Hibernation for more than 30 years! nt - Dan Banquer 12:12:27 06/06/06 (3)
- Georgia, not Hibernation (nt) - E-Stat 14:12:01 06/06/06 (2)
- Hiber(nia) Nation? - real_jj 16:13:57 06/06/06 (1)
- Nah - E-Stat 06:20:49 06/07/06 (0)
- Exactly - E-Stat 11:48:41 06/06/06 (2)
- Re: Exactly - tomservo 12:43:58 06/06/06 (1)
- You have again stated my point - E-Stat 20:28:16 06/06/06 (0)