Yo - Ozzie, we've had this discussion before - E-Stat

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 02:58:16 02/01/07 (74)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - morricab 06:15:26 02/02/07 (3)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:33:51 02/02/07 (2)

I think you're the ultimate troll - suits_me 19:57:24 02/03/07 (0)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - morricab 14:46:13 02/03/07 (0)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - hahax@verizon.net 20:28:07 02/01/07 (1)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:37:20 02/02/07 (0)

You almost havie it backwords... - RGA 17:42:49 02/01/07 (36)

Strongly disagree. - jsm 11:44:56 02/02/07 (4)

Re: Strongly disagree. - RGA 18:42:15 02/02/07 (3)

Ah, but a smooth frequency response does not guarantee good classical music performance. - jsm 12:33:13 02/05/07 (0)

Re: Strongly disagree. - morricab 14:49:15 02/03/07 (1)

Re: Strongly disagree. - DRCope 10:46:55 02/05/07 (0)

Re: You almost havie it backwords... - JimL 19:58:22 02/01/07 (30)

Re: You almost havie it backwords... - RGA 03:00:32 02/02/07 (23)

You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 07:32:00 02/02/07 (22)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 18:44:15 02/02/07 (6)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 05:34:46 02/03/07 (5)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 05:55:25 02/03/07 (4)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 07:15:47 02/03/07 (3)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 08:17:48 02/03/07 (2)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 09:14:42 02/03/07 (1)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 17:18:26 02/03/07 (0)

Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 18:37:58 02/02/07 (0)

Interestingly . . . - markrohr 14:36:34 02/02/07 (2)

Re: Interestingly . . . - Pat D 18:07:38 02/02/07 (1)

Re: Interestingly . . . - morricab 14:53:57 02/03/07 (0)

Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - beppe61 10:54:01 02/02/07 (10)

Re: Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - Pat D 17:55:31 02/02/07 (9)

Re: Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - RGA 19:14:08 02/02/07 (8)

Re: Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - morricab 14:56:21 02/03/07 (0)

Errrr . . . - Pat D 06:02:26 02/03/07 (6)

Re: Errrr . . . - RGA 08:44:43 02/03/07 (5)

Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - Pat D 10:17:20 02/03/07 (4)

Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - RGA 17:41:31 02/03/07 (3)

Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - Pat D 19:04:00 02/03/07 (2)

Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - RGA 19:55:47 02/03/07 (1)

Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - Pat D 04:22:14 02/04/07 (0)

Re: You almost havie it backwords... - longtimequadowner 23:50:26 02/01/07 (5)

The EQ illustrates my point. - RGA 03:33:25 02/02/07 (1)

Re: The EQ illustrates my point. - beppe61 10:59:07 02/02/07 (0)

" Take a look at a square wave passed through a quad - it's square! " - beppe61 00:13:14 02/02/07 (2)

Actually - longtimequadowner 01:03:30 02/02/07 (1)

Re: Actually - beppe61 10:46:26 02/02/07 (0)

Well, some people swear this speaker sounds great. - The Real Dick Hertz 16:53:11 02/01/07 (3)

Nevertheless distortion is very low ... could this be instead .. - beppe61 11:09:12 02/02/07 (0)

Re: Well, some people swear this speaker sounds great. - beppe61 11:02:22 02/02/07 (0)

Wow!! - Jayme 17:21:08 02/01/07 (0)

Flat response is only the beginning. - richardl 15:37:31 02/01/07 (1)

Re: Flat response is only the beginning. - beppe61 11:12:03 02/02/07 (0)

This may help you - Schu 14:47:41 02/01/07 (1)

Re: This may help you - beppe61 10:35:15 02/02/07 (0)

A flat frequency response will never sound good -- it's not a goal - Richard BassNut Greene 08:54:53 02/01/07 (2)

Why not tilted down ever so slightly? - Ozzie 10:57:17 02/02/07 (1)

Re: A flat frequency response will never sound good -- it's not a goal - beppe61 11:14:46 02/01/07 (0)

One drive unit playing in uniform manner from 60-18kHz is a tall order - Gregm 08:45:20 02/01/07 (7)

And achievable with electrostats :) - E-Stat 16:38:12 02/01/07 (5)

Keep believing that E-Stat. p - Ozzie 11:12:22 02/02/07 (4)

Keep believing what? - E-Stat 19:46:49 02/02/07 (3)

Re: Keep believing what? - Ozzie 10:24:07 02/05/07 (2)

You're kidding, right? - E-Stat 12:25:25 02/05/07 (1)

Yo - Ozzie, we've had this discussion before - E-Stat 15:14:47 02/05/07 (0)

Re: One drive unit playing in uniform manner from 60-18kHz is a tall order - beppe61 10:48:52 02/01/07 (0)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - Schu 05:42:52 02/01/07 (7)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 07:24:00 02/01/07 (6)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - Schu 08:31:42 02/01/07 (3)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:54:42 02/01/07 (2)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - Schu 11:02:00 02/01/07 (1)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 13:30:11 02/01/07 (0)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - STUART 08:25:19 02/01/07 (1)

Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:59:24 02/01/07 (0)

Suppose... - RobertG 05:20:37 02/01/07 (3)

Re: Suppose... - beppe61 07:39:24 02/01/07 (2)

So you said "low distortion". - sser2 11:51:31 02/01/07 (1)

Re: So you said "low distortion". - beppe61 13:36:30 02/01/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Yo - Ozzie, we've had this discussion before - E-Stat 15:14:47 02/05/07 (0)