Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

  Register / Login

Here's what I would do...

to determine the most conservative audibility level - ie lowest audibility of distortion. I would "manufacture" a continuously sweeping sines wave signal at a very low level and mix that with samples of music signals and a set of the same music samples with no swept signal. Then have a set of samples with a slightly higher swept sine signal. Using ABX, play the sample sets until a bias in the results is created.

Since distortion components cannot be predicted, and the sine wave signal will at some time will be mostly at a frequency that is arbitrary relative to the music signal. At the point you can no longer discriminate the swept signat you can be pretty certain you could not perceive a disortion component at the same level.

Probably a great wav to use my goldwave program.

Play back equipment would have to have a low distortion capacity itself, or the swept modulation would be creating distortion in the equipment.

Since the music signal has a varying level, reporting the relative level of the distortion signal is a bit problematic in this case. Choices would include relative to the max level, or min level or average level or a statistical median or minumum - Something like the sound the music signal is above 90% of the time.

I'll keep you posted.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Here's what I would do... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 14:21:23 06/16/06 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.