In Reply to: Yes and no. posted by real_jj on June 15, 2006 at 16:44:18:
Apparently I consider "understanding" or as I would call it "pattern recognition" as part of hearing and you do not, limiting it to simple detection. I guess terms should be more strictly defined, one reason why these Internet discussions never amount to much.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- OK I'm with you... - tunenut 17:23:10 06/15/06 (11)
- Re: OK I'm with you... - morricab 02:30:00 06/16/06 (10)
- Re: OK I'm with you... - Ted Smith 08:39:54 06/16/06 (9)
- Indeed.... - real_jj 10:40:24 06/16/06 (8)
- Re: Indeed.... - morricab 12:03:17 06/16/06 (3)
- No, that's a different issue... - real_jj 12:07:52 06/16/06 (2)
- Re: No, that's a different issue... - morricab 12:15:36 06/16/06 (1)
- Yes, but it's filled in with your expectation... - real_jj 12:32:49 06/16/06 (0)
- electronic voice phenomenon? - Ted Smith 10:52:39 06/16/06 (2)
- Can't say as I blame you... - real_jj 11:36:14 06/16/06 (1)
- Yep, that's why I blew it off. [nt] - Ted Smith 11:42:28 06/16/06 (0)
- Re: Indeed.... - Ted Smith 10:50:07 06/16/06 (0)