|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Still no good posted by racerguy on September 20, 2006 at 20:32:55:
<< I don't know, and I don't care. What I do know is that you are making ASSumptions >>Actually, you are the one making assumptions. The fact is that it is part of my job to be familiar with the various techniques used to measure digital audio equipment. I have been doing my job for twenty years, and am pretty good at it.
I wouldn't make the claim that the studies Christine cited were using different (and non-comparable) measurement techniques than Stereophile uses unless I were confident that was the case.
Of course, I am not perfect and could be wrong. If that were the case, it would be pretty easy for Christine to refute my claim. But that's not what she did.
Instead she said that all of the *Stereophile* measurements she cited were made using the same technique. Since I never even implied that they weren't, I simply pointed out that her reading comprehension was quite poor.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Still no good - Charles Hansen 20:53:31 09/20/06 (3)
- Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 05:25:56 09/21/06 (2)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - Charles Hansen 07:24:03 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 07:50:06 09/21/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
