In Reply to: Re: Get it straight, would you? posted by J on December 4, 2006 at 22:31:31:
You again proved me correct. Thanks.
Its just that you strain to misinterpet the facts to feed your hero worship. This is not a musical issue, it is a personality issue. It has little to do with rock music, it has lots to do with small egos latching onto others for self importance. Do yo have Beatle cards? Beatles bobble head dolls. Adorin g pictures of the lads in their 20's?
I bet you do.
BULLETIN: The two that are left are old men.And the "explaining away" their awful live perforamnces does not make them a good band; you have listed some (who reads your entire post?) factors as to why they were lousy live. Explaining why does not mean they were good. They were lousy live after the Cavern Club. Listen for George blowing the guitar part on Nowhere Man in Germany, (4 times?) or the harmonies on That Boy on Ed Sullivan where George grimaces at how bad they sound.
This has more to do with you, than with music, adn the thread should end. You are no different that ESKEKL; and rememebring my posts from a year ago is not a sign of a good memeory, but of fanatacism. I certainly do not care or remember yours.
Last point:
I know they were lousy live; I was there I heard them live.
Were you?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Don't piss in my pocket and tell me its raining. - Duilawyer 07:55:03 12/05/06 (5)
- Re: Please - J 08:39:33 12/05/06 (4)
- Re: Can you explain 'clams' please [regarding live bootlegs]? * - Sophisticated One 03:35:45 12/06/06 (2)
- Re: - J 10:27:04 12/06/06 (1)
- Re: Thanks for explaining * - Sophisticated One 06:08:46 12/07/06 (0)
- completely bozo. Do yourself a favor; get a life. - Duilawyer 17:46:13 12/05/06 (0)