![]() |
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt posted by okiemax on June 3, 2006 at 20:02:29:
The only restriction on DBTs I'm aware of is that those being tested not have any way to know which piece of equipment they are being presented with at any given time. This prevents them from making biased judgements. The test is designed to be fair, not necessarily short. If it takes a long time for a listener to evaluate each stimulus, that is well within the possibilites of DBTs. If you read the DBT policy statement on this site, you will see that their position is that DBTs are the only way to accurately determine whether or not subtle differences between audio components actually exist. This is consistant with all respected scientific methods of investigation. Anti DBT bias is the mantra of those who do not want you to get at the truth. As a consumer, why wouldn't you want to know? Why would it bother you to learn that a $500 amplifier sounds no different from a $5000 amplifier? Unless maybe you don't want to know that you just wasted $4500. Or are about to.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Soundmind 00:49:01 06/04/06 (32)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Phil Tower 08:27:56 06/04/06 (27)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Soundmind 08:39:06 06/04/06 (26)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Phil Tower 15:19:09 06/04/06 (0)
- What I believe (very long post) - Phil Tower 15:07:57 06/04/06 (24)
- You call that a long post? Risch once had one on AR which took 9 boards...and said nothing...as usual ;-) nt - Soundmind 17:19:13 06/04/06 (21)
- Don't get me started on Risch. That's when I really start to get myself in trouble around here. (NT) - Phil Tower 20:08:24 06/04/06 (20)
- You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 11:23:05 06/05/06 (19)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 17:03:19 06/05/06 (13)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Pat D 20:29:47 06/05/06 (7)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 20:44:57 06/05/06 (6)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 06:25:36 06/06/06 (5)
- Um, was that the fallacy of the excluded middle, soundmind? - real_jj 12:37:52 06/06/06 (3)
- you are absolutely correct - Soundmind 16:07:49 06/06/06 (2)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 10:17:43 06/06/06 (0)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:00:02 06/05/06 (4)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 18:24:13 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:46:42 06/05/06 (0)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:14:48 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - john curl 10:58:53 06/09/06 (0)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 16:25:47 06/05/06 (4)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 17:50:54 06/05/06 (3)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 18:12:50 06/05/06 (2)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:39:36 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 20:51:12 06/05/06 (0)
- Re: What I believe (very long post) - Soundmind 16:11:57 06/04/06 (1)
- Re: What I believe (very long post) - Phil Tower 20:05:52 06/04/06 (0)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - okiemax 01:51:58 06/04/06 (3)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Soundmind 07:50:06 06/04/06 (2)
- My point : number of trials should be specified before a DBT begins - okiemax 09:57:26 06/04/06 (1)
- Why should the number of trials should be specified before a DBT begins? - Soundmind 15:49:07 06/05/06 (0)