In Reply to: well... posted by drclark on June 18, 2005 at 08:34:23:
interesting post'it it works (makes a difference that is of value) who cares why?'
obviously many of the members here at aa do. if people didn't show an interest in how things work there would be no technological advances. this may or may not be a good thing
if people want to use a product that they feels improves their life who am i to complain? however, i don't approve of products that claim to do something they do not, or that make false scientific claims. if the chips makers had simply said 'it might improve sound quality' rather than making outrageous claims about rearranging the molecules on a cd i wouldn't be as concerned. if the chip is possibly a placebo then i think its only right potential consumers are made aware of this. i have yet to see evidence of it making any change to the digital data-stream from the cd, or viable explanation of how it would do this. personally this leads me to one conclusion.
i would be interested in links to tests that show a measurable effect on the data (any difference would be measurable) as even the slightest difference could explain why some people here a difference? if there is more information or different information it will be measurable, if there is less jitter it will be measurable an so forth. that is the beauty of working in the digital domain.
PAR
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: well... - Par Time Punk 03:00:00 06/19/05 (24)
- Re: well... - KlausR. 03:18:16 06/19/05 (23)
- Re: well... - Par Time Punk 01:01:40 06/20/05 (22)
- Re: Believe the hype... - geoffkait 02:48:57 06/20/05 (21)
- Has it got the "EC approved" stamp? (nt) - orejones 03:47:14 06/20/05 (20)
- Re: The editor and senior reviewer of Hi Fi News liked it... - geoffkait 04:33:05 06/20/05 (19)
- Do you know what that approval means? It seems you don´t... (nt) - orejones 04:36:03 06/21/05 (14)
- Re: Approval - geoffkait 04:52:39 06/21/05 (13)
- QEE (Quod Erat Expectandum) (nt) - orejones 10:27:23 06/21/05 (12)
- Re: AAAI (Ad Absurdum Ad Infinitum) nt - geoffkait 14:10:15 06/21/05 (11)
- "AAAI (Ad Absurdum Ad Infinitum)" ... a nice definition of the whole GSIC affair, isn´t it? (nt) - orejones 02:31:46 06/22/05 (10)
- Re: There's an old French expression, "It takes two to tango." nt - geoffkait 02:57:34 06/22/05 (9)
- No Geoff, in France they say:.... - KlausR. 01:06:20 06/24/05 (4)
- Re: Klaus, over here we have an expression... - geoffkait 03:26:51 06/24/05 (3)
- I see you've fed your bablefish - KlausR. 05:17:46 06/24/05 (2)
- Re: Just the facts, Ma'am - geoffkait 06:34:32 06/24/05 (1)
- Facts, where are facts? - KlausR. 07:28:11 06/24/05 (0)
- NOT French !! - clifff 14:13:54 06/23/05 (3)
- Re: You're right! - geoffkait 14:49:38 06/23/05 (2)
- Don't give up your day job. - clifff 15:14:47 06/23/05 (1)
- Re: Cliffff - You're too fast for me :-) nt - geoffkait 04:41:49 06/24/05 (0)
- And the audio press also likes... - KlausR. 09:36:28 06/20/05 (3)
- Re: Really? Two reviewers agree on something? n - geoffkait 12:05:22 06/20/05 (2)
- You did not get my point, did you??? - KlausR. 09:25:53 06/21/05 (1)
- Re: You had a point? - geoffkait 10:24:34 06/21/05 (0)