In Reply to: Re: bad science as.... posted by john curl on March 30, 2005 at 23:18:03:
"Quantum dots seem the most plausable component that 'might' cause an effect like this."Why? You don't even know if there's a quantum dot on the disc, so how can you say that it's the most plausible explanation? It's a valid question.
"Trying to understand things like this is our hobby, you might say, and sometimes we can profit from the added knowledge and experience it gives us on the frontline of physics."
The frontline of physics? Clarke writes for an audio mag, you make amps, and Geoff sells gigahertz tweeters and jars of rocks. I always imagined the frontline of physics being a little more cutting edsge,but what do I know? Don't answer that:-)
Facts seem to be the hardest thing to come by with this chip, and the most pathetic thing about it is that it takes an idiot like me to have to provide you guys with all your info. That's a pretty sad commentary on the frontline of physics wouldn't you agree?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: bad science as.... - Allan 06:03:36 03/31/05 (12)
- Re: bad science as.... - Jim Willis 09:05:27 03/31/05 (1)
- ROTFLMAO!!! (nt) - Joe II-V 00:05:56 04/01/05 (0)
- Re: bad science as.... - john curl 08:47:53 03/31/05 (9)
- Re: bad science as.... - Jim Willis 09:07:05 03/31/05 (8)
- Mr. Curl has stated that Geoff Kait, Clark Johnsen and himself... - Wellfed 19:22:15 03/31/05 (7)
- Re: So far... - Jim Willis 19:46:01 03/31/05 (6)
- I believe you missed my point... - Wellfed 22:27:41 03/31/05 (1)
- Re: And I believe you missed mine... - Jim Willis 04:16:02 04/01/05 (0)
- Re: So far... - john curl 22:03:08 03/31/05 (3)
- Re: So far... - a dainty man 07:27:07 04/01/05 (1)
- Re: So far... - john curl 16:00:57 04/04/05 (0)
- Re: So far... - Joe II-V 00:11:34 04/01/05 (0)