In Reply to: .How about the Basics? posted by Dan Banquer on March 31, 2005 at 12:09:10:
Even were I to concede this and that "rational" people are concerned, what is their right to be concerned? Are you protecting someone? And what if you are wrong, that it is technical innovation? I certainly cannot say that the case has been made, IMHO, by either side; and I certainly have heard an improvement which I am not willing to concede is just psychology any more than my arguing that those who don't hear a difference are not also affected by their own biases.Again I just don't understand the intensity of those who see the IC as a scam.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not technical innovation, just psychology - Norm 14:32:27 03/31/05 (7)
- Re: Not technical innovation, just psychology - Dan Banquer 15:48:48 03/31/05 (6)
- I am glad you understand. nt - Norm 16:44:30 03/31/05 (5)
- Re: I am glad you understand. nt - Dan Banquer 17:39:35 03/31/05 (4)
- You are asking me to believe you that I am delusional as were the 7 others in the room - Norm 18:27:25 03/31/05 (3)
- I wasn't the one asking... - Steve Eddy 23:56:09 03/31/05 (2)
- Re: I wasn't the one asking...Steve...if you hadN'T amplified... - Guy 01:26:10 04/01/05 (1)
- Try waving a chip over your monitor (nt) - pburant 06:36:05 04/01/05 (0)