In Reply to: RE: "there is no such thing as independance in trade magazines" posted by robert.gaboury@videotron.ca on May 22, 2009 at 08:29:11:
Well, duh, of course magazines depend on advertising revenue. That's obvious to anyone who reads magazines. Entertainment Weekly is not subsisting on the less than 25 cents I paid for each issue in my 3 year subscription! However, it's an absurd leap from the patently obvious fact that magazines need advertising to your assertion that "The only problem I have is when some 'journalist' claim press independance relative to advertising." Someone has to pay to produce a magazine, but the critical question is does that affect the content? To cite my own example, since I had no contact with the ad sales rep how exactly was the honesty of my reviews compromised by the presence or absence of any particular advertiser? My review had already been printed when the pissed - off importer cancelled his ads, so even if he had wanted to use the cancellation to threaten Art it was too late (in any case Art would have told the fellow to go f**k himself if such a threat had been made). The reviews I subsequently wrote weren't affected by the cancellation either. I wrote negative reviews (hello, Roksan Xerxes X) and positive reviews and Art published them all without alteration. How exactly was my independence affected?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "there is no such thing as independance in trade magazines" - Rob Doorack 09:07:49 05/22/09 (20)
- RE: "there is no such thing as independance in trade magazines" - robert.gaboury@videotron.ca 09:41:35 05/22/09 (19)
- RE: "there is no such thing as independance in trade magazines" - Rob Doorack 11:20:41 05/22/09 (12)
- Don't get me wrong... - robert.gaboury@videotron.ca 12:16:07 05/22/09 (11)
- Independence. "You keep using that word." - Rob Doorack 14:34:29 05/22/09 (10)
- Hmm ... So the fable about killing the goose that laid the golden egg ... - Bhasi 06:07:11 05/23/09 (9)
- The return of the Underpants Gnomes - Rob Doorack 20:04:59 05/23/09 (8)
- I fear we inhabit different planets! - Bhasi 06:57:14 05/24/09 (7)
- So, you're utterly unable to explain your belief that discounts cause corruption - Rob Doorack 15:20:35 05/24/09 (6)
- ETHICS - robert.gaboury@videotron.ca 05:59:36 05/25/09 (4)
- RE: ETHICS - Alan Sircom 03:16:23 05/28/09 (0)
- ethics... - mkuller 13:39:01 05/25/09 (2)
- BLANKET ACCUSATIONS... - robert.gaboury@videotron.ca 13:56:05 05/25/09 (1)
- Can't provide an answer, eh, so you try deflection...(nt) - mkuller 10:13:02 05/26/09 (0)
- "We waste 50% of our maketing budget every year ... - Bhasi 00:51:26 05/25/09 (0)
- Yawn: Payola again? Here comes another lost lamb - Sordidman 10:32:41 05/22/09 (0)
- The distinction... - mkuller 10:29:51 05/22/09 (4)
- wow - robert.gaboury@videotron.ca 10:52:55 05/22/09 (3)
- As a former reviewer... - mkuller 11:02:33 05/22/09 (2)
- RE: As a former reviewer... - robert.gaboury@videotron.ca 11:17:45 05/22/09 (1)
- Evidence that any reviewers are influenced and not impartial... - mkuller 13:31:35 05/22/09 (0)