![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Seismic Isolation for Loudspeakers (Bound and Gagged No More!) posted by canuck on December 31, 2002 at 07:55:43:
Hi canuck,"...you said something like Newtonian physics don't apply in your system"
I think you misunderstood my intention. I didn't say Newtons laws don't apply, I said "What the experience taught me was the expected Newtonian action-re-action does not occur here". Emphasis on "expected" and "here". Perhaps there is some degree of action-re-action but if there is, it is not only nothing like what this former subscriber to the conventional wisdom would have expected, it is insignificant relative to the consistent, across the board improvements in the system's ability to retrieve information from the recordings.
Doppler distortion? That should result in a loss of focus shouldn't it? We're hearing a distinct increase in focus.
And yes, I believe the addition of an air bearing for vertical isolation would only improve the results. This is a lot tougher to implement, especially with a tall speaker, than the simple addition of roller bearings. (I'm working on it.)
The purpose of my initial post was to share my findings with others who are interested, particularly those who know and enjoy the benefits of seismic isolation in the form of mechanical low-pass filters. Addtionally, I'd like to find a better understanding of the "Why" here. You'll notice I said "I believe" in my statement about the "why". I don't really know that a truck changing gears 1/2 mile away or the ocean tide or tectonic activity are messing up our systems' performance. I just know that providing isolation from the types of frequencies these things generate has allowed my system to perform well beyond what I thought it could, consistently and repeatably and not at all subtly.
I am very interested in the "why" but will admit this interest pales in relation to the wonder and joy we've been experiencing in the Music room.
Happy Listening!
Barry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Newton - bdiament 08:46:25 12/31/02 (13)
- Re: "the expected Newtonian action-re-action does not occur here" - David Aiken 13:09:47 12/31/02 (6)
- Re: the expected Newtonian re-action - bdiament 14:28:46 12/31/02 (5)
- Re: the expected Newtonian re-action - David Aiken 02:32:35 01/01/03 (4)
- Thanks - bdiament 07:34:39 01/01/03 (3)
- Doppler again - David Aiken 14:41:39 01/01/03 (2)
- Re: Doppler again - Angus Mitchell 10:59:02 01/02/03 (0)
- Re: Doppler again - bdiament 06:42:19 01/02/03 (0)
- Re: Newton - Angus Mitchell 10:33:06 12/31/02 (1)
- Re: Doppler 2 - bdiament 12:12:49 12/31/02 (0)
- While you work out how to add an air bearing... - PranaBindu 10:25:14 12/31/02 (3)
- Re: While you work out how to add an air bearing... - bdiament 11:56:48 12/31/02 (2)
- Re: While you work out how to add an air bearing... - canuck 12:35:49 12/31/02 (1)
- Re: While you work out how to add an air bearing... - bdiament 14:37:45 12/31/02 (0)