Re: Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-)

Posted by jneutron (A) on September 28, 2005 at 06:48:13

In Reply to: Re: Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-) posted by Jon Risch on September 27, 2005 at 20:22:54:

JR: "" that I still can not think of a plausible scientific reason for an Intelligent Chip to work, ""

Nobody has, Jon. Period. The only explanations given are stupidly incorrect, fraudulent entities..would you care to explain how a laser can escape a transport, reflect diffusively and still maintain a gaussian profile? Otherwise, the house of cards falls..

You know better than to stick your neck into that fray, as you well know the explanation to be a crock..

Now, it has been said that the effect MIGRATES from one disk to another??? Great...

JR: ""despite your denial and head-in-the-sand attitude about the matter, some folks DO NOT have an open mind, and DO NOT follow the true tenants of science in terms of examining evidence and following up on hypotheses)""

I hope you are having fun making up things and attrributing them to me..Many many people are closed minded..people who side with you, and people who side against you..and I've stated that before..but you know that..

JR: ""(after all, we were all poor confused college students not so very long ago)""

Speak for yourself...it was very very long ago..:-)

JR: ""I note that you took Ted at his word regarding the imaging of your prototype speaker cables, and you do actually seem to be acting on that input, rather than dismissing it as a placebo - delusion - insanity episode. ""

Where have you been???

That happened, what, one or was it two YEARS ago??? And I have been clear as a bell as to what transpired, posting his comments on prop with his approval to do so..

I have been up front and very open about everything on that test, in FOUR forums....and NOW you notice??? You're fallin behind, Jon..:-)
Seriously, you are allowing your gut level defensive reaction cloud your judgment..you would be better off actually understanding what I am doing, instead of blindly attempting to shoot down what you don't understand..

JR: ""but if an issue or problem ha nver even been experienced, if it is not even "real" for you or does not exist in your experiences, how can you even begin to think about it in terms of analysis or reasons? ""

Who said it is not real?? Stop with that nonsense..

The fact that I am working on the leading edge of hearing research capabilities is proof positive that I have "begun" as you put it, to think about it in terms of analysis and reasons..

Maybe you are incapable of thinking beyond your personal experience, but luckily, the vast bulk of scientists, physicists, and engineers are not hindered by your inabilities..think earthquakes and hurricanes..

JR: ""but second hand experience is not the same as actually having been there yourself, to have actually lived through the factual occurance of an event. ""

OK, so now you've had time to think of earthquakes and hurricanes...

Imagine how far behind current technology we would be if all the structural engineers who design buildings were REQUIRED AS JON RISCH PROCLAIMS, to live through some earthquakes or hurricanes, because designing building to meet the stresses of those events cannot be done since it ""is not the same as actually having been there yourself"".

That is what engineering is all about..learning..and teaching..not your limited world of "you can't know if you don't experience it".

JR: ""Even if you intellectualy accept that you have to trust those someone elses, that you must allow the to be real and valid, without a personal validation, there will always be doubts, always be a way to ultimately dismiss those 2nd hjand accoutns as less than real, less than a solid occurence to be fully reckoned with""

You obviously cannot think outside your experience box..don't try to impress your limitations on others..it is that exact attitude that has fostered this "high end vs the world" crap..Face it, not everybody who calls some of your stuff what it is, is your enemy..

JR: ""So with out the kind of certainty that a personal experience can bring, you are left with just an intellectual bit of data, one that is too easy to ultimately ignore or dismiss in moments of doubt or uncertainty.""

I have personal experience with current induced wire forces far beyond anything you can understand, at levels far beyond anything you will ever experience....and when I relate the simple equations that are used in your day job, you ignore them as irrelevant..guess what, your co-workers who put wire into a magnetic field know better..

I note you chose not to address the technical aspect of my post..you never do..

Three other notes...

1. Hope all is well at the home front..

2. Hadta go on med for cholesterol..so moose tracks is gone forever..:-(

3. Has anyone done a power loss analysis comparison of single wire vs bi-wire? I'm suspecting a non-linearity in a linear system...hmmm

Cheers, John.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - better magnet wire, better transformer? - Slawney 09:07:40 09/20/05 (44)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - Steve Eddy 19:36:18 09/21/05 (3)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - pkell44 07:39:23 09/22/05 (2)

Oh ,get real! - clifff 14:55:05 09/22/05 (1)

Re: Oh ,get real! - pkell44 16:06:58 09/22/05 (0)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - jcarr 11:25:58 09/21/05 (2)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - pkell44 16:19:04 09/22/05 (0)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - john curl 12:17:15 09/21/05 (0)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - john curl 09:30:59 09/21/05 (1)

oh sure..:-) - jneutron 13:39:31 09/21/05 (0)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - Tweekeng 10:52:12 09/20/05 (34)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - pkell44 17:34:20 09/21/05 (3)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - Steve Eddy 19:56:06 09/21/05 (2)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - pkell44 07:15:14 09/22/05 (1)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - Steve Eddy 21:28:22 09/22/05 (0)

What on earth makes you think ....simply.... - Russ57 14:38:19 09/20/05 (1)

Virgin copper? Not enough! - Jacques 03:06:00 09/21/05 (0)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - Slawney 12:01:18 09/20/05 (27)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - jneutron 05:55:16 09/21/05 (0)

Re: better magnet wire, better transformer? - Tweekeng 12:49:21 09/20/05 (25)

Actually, ALL of the music comes thru the power transfomer. - jeffreybehr 13:12:26 09/20/05 (24)

Re: Actually, ALL of the music comes thru the power transfomer. - Tweekeng 13:57:12 09/20/05 (23)

IMO this is incorrect - Soundripples 06:37:34 09/21/05 (22)

Re: IMO this is incorrect - Tweekeng 08:05:02 09/21/05 (17)

hmm - jneutron 08:18:51 09/21/05 (16)

Re: hmm - Tweekeng 09:09:17 09/21/05 (15)

Re: hmm - pkell44 16:30:16 09/22/05 (0)

Re: hmm - jneutron 10:18:25 09/21/05 (13)

Re: hmm - pkell44 16:36:04 09/22/05 (0)

Amazing what our brain can do - Russ57 11:06:44 09/21/05 (11)

Re: Amazing what our brain can do - pkell44 16:39:26 09/22/05 (0)

Re: Amazing what our brain can do - Tweekeng 07:17:33 09/22/05 (3)

Re: Amazing what our brain can do - pkell44 16:40:38 09/22/05 (0)

Yes, it is. - jneutron 09:04:00 09/22/05 (0)

The power of faith is not the same as being deluded - Russ57 09:02:26 09/22/05 (0)

Re: Amazing what our brain can do - jneutron 11:58:59 09/21/05 (5)

Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-) - KCHANG 15:24:31 09/22/05 (4)

Re: Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-) - jneutron 07:00:36 09/23/05 (3)

Re: Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-) - Jon Risch 20:22:54 09/27/05 (1)

Re: Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-) - jneutron 06:48:13 09/28/05 (0)

Re: Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-) - KCHANG 09:25:05 09/23/05 (0)

Re: IMO this is incorrect - jneutron 06:51:49 09/21/05 (3)

Re: IMO this is incorrect - Soundripples 07:26:02 09/21/05 (1)

Figured you'd like it.. - jneutron 08:07:03 09/21/05 (0)

Please do not misunderstand me. - jneutron 07:24:01 09/21/05 (0)

Well, I'm glad you've listened VERY carefully to so many of these... - jeffreybehr 16:03:10 09/20/05 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Methodology for identifying crapola? ;-) - jneutron 06:48:13 09/28/05 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.