In Reply to: Re: We have about 180,000 inventors a year... posted by KlausR. on May 8, 2005 at 03:42:54:
If you don't agree that a quantum dot's (or quantum well) emitted light can have strange or very unusual effects you are behind the times.It is certainly incorrect to say that "light is light." For example, coherent light is quite different (in its characteristics and effects) from ordinary (non-coherent) light. The difference in light characteristics between a "well" and "dot" is not as great; however, among other things, the "dot" (due to 3-D confinement) forces the emitted photons to behave as waves only - i.e., not particles - in all 3 dimensions.
All depends on what you are attempting to do (application). To maximize fluorescence intensity, quantum yield and light-matter interaction effects, I would choose quantum dot (or quantum dot array) over quantum well.
Answer to your Q regarding whether JSMR has a newer explanation: I don't know.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Light is light" - geoffkait 05:10:41 05/08/05 (50)
- No more wave-particle dualism? - KlausR. 06:22:43 05/08/05 (49)
- Re: wave-particle dualism - geoffkait 06:48:11 05/08/05 (48)
- Your TV anecdote - KlausR. 09:07:57 05/08/05 (47)
- Re: CDP laser - geoffkait 09:35:07 05/08/05 (40)
- Re: CDP laser - KlausR. 09:58:27 05/08/05 (39)
- Re: Fatal Flaw - geoffkait 10:52:51 05/08/05 (38)
- Flaw, there's lots of them - KlausR. 11:03:48 05/08/05 (37)
- Re: There's a flaw, allright - geoffkait 11:20:46 05/08/05 (36)
- Flaws there are... - KlausR. 01:47:14 05/09/05 (35)
- Re: Sleepy Time - geoffkait 04:30:56 05/09/05 (34)
- Re: Sleepy Time - KlausR. 05:28:52 05/09/05 (33)
- Re: - geoffkait 06:23:29 05/09/05 (32)
- Photons and CDP - KlausR. 23:10:39 05/09/05 (31)
- Re: Photons and CDP - geoffkait 03:02:05 05/10/05 (30)
- Laser light - KlausR. 03:48:34 05/10/05 (29)
- Re: Laser light - geoffkait 04:52:18 05/10/05 (28)
- Re: Laser light - KlausR. 08:56:45 05/10/05 (27)
- Re: Photons and Metals - geoffkait 18:55:59 05/10/05 (25)
- Re:I call Bullshit - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:16:45 05/19/05 (0)
- Re: - KlausR. 03:07:13 05/11/05 (23)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 05:40:40 05/11/05 (22)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 07:47:14 05/11/05 (21)
- Re: quantum material - geoffkait 09:15:59 05/11/05 (0)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 08:37:34 05/11/05 (19)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 00:29:48 05/12/05 (18)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 03:18:59 05/12/05 (17)
- Your bird told you right! - KlausR. 05:16:10 05/12/05 (16)
- Re: Your bird told you right! - geoffkait 06:20:13 05/12/05 (15)
- Hold on, Geoff! - KlausR. 06:34:34 05/12/05 (14)
- Re: East is East - geoffkait 07:37:45 05/12/05 (13)
- I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 08:00:57 05/12/05 (12)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - geoffkait 16:30:56 05/12/05 (11)
- Expert opinion about DBT - KlausR. 03:07:30 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: Expert opinion about DBT - geoffkait 03:40:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 01:49:42 05/13/05 (8)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 03:38:09 05/13/05 (7)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 04:08:25 05/13/05 (6)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 05:38:07 05/13/05 (5)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 07:03:39 05/13/05 (4)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 07:23:30 05/13/05 (2)
- Re: The full story - KlausR. 08:07:17 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 11:02:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Homework, due diligence, etc.... - pburant 07:08:58 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: intermission - geoffkait 11:34:49 05/10/05 (0)
- Additional question - KlausR. 09:31:18 05/08/05 (5)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 09:41:02 05/08/05 (4)
- Next question! - KlausR. 10:04:10 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 09:54:27 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 11:07:13 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 11:35:30 05/08/05 (0)