![]() |
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Re: legitimate disagreement posted by Steve Eddy on May 7, 2005 at 17:30:20:
You have poorly summarized the discussions between Klaus and me (why do you even care is the question). I responded to most of his questions, as you will see if you read the thread(s). Have you even read them?Do you honestly think because Klaus rejects a statement of mine that means he is correct? Give me a break. He rejected them because he had made up his mind for not reason other than he would not accept the proposition that the chip could possible work. Period. All of his responses support his pre-conceived conclusion. (sound familiar?)
As I already said, the article is well under way and has taken time because of its complexities.
Off topic: Why do your posts always sound so angry? Might I suggest more fiber in your diet?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 18:38:12 05/07/05 (5)
- "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - BS64 10:22:10 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - Steve Eddy 10:33:45 05/08/05 (1)
- "Simple. Tactics." - BS64 10:40:24 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 21:00:13 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 02:02:53 05/08/05 (0)