![]() |
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Re: Because I did not think for one second... posted by john curl on May 5, 2005 at 11:54:51:
or to provide evidence. I consider that remark as breaking asylum posting rule F.:Watch your languageThis chip, when at work, encounters several major physical obstacles, none of which you (or anyone else) are able to explain. According to current knowledge that chip CAN NOT work and you should admit that. I must therefore conclude that any audible effect is purely imaginary. And you can't rule that out for sure, can you? You are 63 years old, what about age induced hearing impairment? How can we trust people who can't hear properly?
The only useful effect the chip has is shifting money towards dealers and manufacturer. The latter has not bothered to respond either. Nor did Allen Chang.
One really has to wonder why the explanation has to be "reverse-engineered" by third parties AFTER the product has been put to market. That alone should be reason enough for serious doubts.
As long as there is no explanation as to how the chip works any demand relating to that matter is not senseless, won't you think? As long as all these questions can not be answered to a satisfying degree, the chip has to be considered as a joke, to put it mildly.
And please tell us who is "we". And you further appear to have a wrong notion of what I'm asking: I do not ask for proof (proof you have given by hearing audible effects), I do ask for a sound explanation which does not violate the rules of science and which does not leave unanswered questions in its wake.
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - KlausR. 04:58:17 05/06/05 (102)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - john curl 12:03:41 05/06/05 (84)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - KlausR. 22:42:19 05/06/05 (74)
- Yes, a lie is a lie - michaelb 04:24:21 05/07/05 (73)
- Re: Yes, a lie is a lie - KlausR. 08:19:56 05/07/05 (72)
- "No one would have ever known" - michaelb 09:29:37 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - geoffkait 08:49:03 05/07/05 (70)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - KlausR. 10:59:57 05/07/05 (67)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - geoffkait 13:20:35 05/07/05 (54)
- We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - KlausR. 22:54:23 05/07/05 (53)
- Re: We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - geoffkait 02:48:52 05/08/05 (52)
- Re: We have about 180,000 inventors a year... - KlausR. 03:42:54 05/08/05 (51)
- Re: "Light is light" - geoffkait 05:10:41 05/08/05 (50)
- No more wave-particle dualism? - KlausR. 06:22:43 05/08/05 (49)
- Re: wave-particle dualism - geoffkait 06:48:11 05/08/05 (48)
- Your TV anecdote - KlausR. 09:07:57 05/08/05 (47)
- Re: CDP laser - geoffkait 09:35:07 05/08/05 (40)
- Re: CDP laser - KlausR. 09:58:27 05/08/05 (39)
- Re: Fatal Flaw - geoffkait 10:52:51 05/08/05 (38)
- Flaw, there's lots of them - KlausR. 11:03:48 05/08/05 (37)
- Re: There's a flaw, allright - geoffkait 11:20:46 05/08/05 (36)
- Flaws there are... - KlausR. 01:47:14 05/09/05 (35)
- Re: Sleepy Time - geoffkait 04:30:56 05/09/05 (34)
- Re: Sleepy Time - KlausR. 05:28:52 05/09/05 (33)
- Re: - geoffkait 06:23:29 05/09/05 (32)
- Photons and CDP - KlausR. 23:10:39 05/09/05 (31)
- Re: Photons and CDP - geoffkait 03:02:05 05/10/05 (30)
- Laser light - KlausR. 03:48:34 05/10/05 (29)
- Re: Laser light - geoffkait 04:52:18 05/10/05 (28)
- Re: Laser light - KlausR. 08:56:45 05/10/05 (27)
- Re: Photons and Metals - geoffkait 18:55:59 05/10/05 (25)
- Re:I call Bullshit - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:16:45 05/19/05 (0)
- Re: - KlausR. 03:07:13 05/11/05 (23)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 05:40:40 05/11/05 (22)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 07:47:14 05/11/05 (21)
- Re: quantum material - geoffkait 09:15:59 05/11/05 (0)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 08:37:34 05/11/05 (19)
- Re: double slit experiment - KlausR. 00:29:48 05/12/05 (18)
- Re: double slit experiment - geoffkait 03:18:59 05/12/05 (17)
- Your bird told you right! - KlausR. 05:16:10 05/12/05 (16)
- Re: Your bird told you right! - geoffkait 06:20:13 05/12/05 (15)
- Hold on, Geoff! - KlausR. 06:34:34 05/12/05 (14)
- Re: East is East - geoffkait 07:37:45 05/12/05 (13)
- I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 08:00:57 05/12/05 (12)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - geoffkait 16:30:56 05/12/05 (11)
- Expert opinion about DBT - KlausR. 03:07:30 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: Expert opinion about DBT - geoffkait 03:40:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: I'm waiting for proof! - KlausR. 01:49:42 05/13/05 (8)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 03:38:09 05/13/05 (7)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 04:08:25 05/13/05 (6)
- Re: coherent photons - geoffkait 05:38:07 05/13/05 (5)
- Re: coherent photons - KlausR. 07:03:39 05/13/05 (4)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 07:23:30 05/13/05 (2)
- Re: The full story - KlausR. 08:07:17 05/13/05 (1)
- Re: The full story - geoffkait 11:02:57 05/13/05 (0)
- Homework, due diligence, etc.... - pburant 07:08:58 05/13/05 (0)
- Re: intermission - geoffkait 11:34:49 05/10/05 (0)
- Additional question - KlausR. 09:31:18 05/08/05 (5)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 09:41:02 05/08/05 (4)
- Next question! - KlausR. 10:04:10 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 09:54:27 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: Additional question - geoffkait 11:07:13 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Additional question - Steve Eddy 11:35:30 05/08/05 (0)
- Face it Klaus... - BS64 11:58:03 05/07/05 (11)
- Re: "we never get a worthy explanation" - geoffkait 12:08:14 05/07/05 (10)
- a misquote and misunderstanding on your part - BS64 16:10:02 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: "we never get a worthy explanation" - Steve Eddy 14:48:26 05/07/05 (8)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 15:37:52 05/07/05 (7)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 17:30:20 05/07/05 (6)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 18:38:12 05/07/05 (5)
- "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - BS64 10:22:10 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: "Why do your posts always sound so angry" - Steve Eddy 10:33:45 05/08/05 (1)
- "Simple. Tactics." - BS64 10:40:24 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - Steve Eddy 21:00:13 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: legitimate disagreement - geoffkait 02:02:53 05/08/05 (0)
- Re: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire - Steve Eddy 09:26:20 05/07/05 (1)
- Re: smokescreen - geoffkait 09:44:49 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - Steve Eddy 14:10:58 05/06/05 (8)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - john curl 16:09:10 05/06/05 (7)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - Steve Eddy 17:55:44 05/06/05 (6)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - john curl 22:19:23 05/06/05 (5)
- Re: Me lying? John, I expect you to apologize.. - Steve Eddy 23:39:10 05/06/05 (0)
- Moral superiority - KlausR. 22:55:50 05/06/05 (3)
- Re: Moral superiority - john curl 11:22:38 05/07/05 (2)
- Re: Answers - geoffkait 16:26:53 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Moral superiority - Steve Eddy 14:02:31 05/07/05 (0)
- Klaus, with all due respect... - Wellfed 10:20:33 05/06/05 (16)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - Steve Eddy 23:18:36 05/06/05 (3)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - Wellfed 09:21:46 05/07/05 (2)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - Steve Eddy 14:19:20 05/07/05 (1)
- Since you're one of the brighter bulbs on the tree Ernest... - Wellfed 16:55:37 05/07/05 (0)
- Re: Klaus, with all due respect... - KlausR. 22:22:20 05/06/05 (0)
- The darkside of electronics - jbmcb 11:28:33 05/06/05 (10)
- Re: The darkside of electronics - Wellfed 09:06:25 05/07/05 (9)
- My point is simple too - KlausR. 01:07:04 05/08/05 (8)
- Re: My point is simple too - Steve Eddy 09:28:34 05/08/05 (7)
- Re: Understanding of science - geoffkait 14:28:49 05/08/05 (6)
- Re: Understanding of science - Steve Eddy 16:26:36 05/08/05 (5)
- Re: State of Bliss - geoffkait 19:08:33 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: State of Bliss - Steve Eddy 20:01:52 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Understanding of science - john curl 17:50:41 05/08/05 (2)
- Re: Understanding of science - Steve Eddy 19:03:57 05/08/05 (1)
- Re: Understanding of science - john curl 20:11:05 05/08/05 (0)