|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? posted by carcass93 on December 15, 2009 at 11:06:16:
> Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter"
> setting? . . . I'm aware of what graphs show - but that's not what
> I personally heard. . .
I didn't make any claims about the superiority of "No Pre/Post filter"
setting in Audition SRC.
I am aware that you and others prefer the filtering, while fmak does not
(he says, in http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=pcaudio&n=56664
"On a bright system, pre-post filtering suppresses some of the peakiness.
However, no filtering sounds better by way of sound staging, naturalness,
and open[n]ess.")
So on that basis (and, I admit, because of the graphs) I decided to
leave the filtering off.
However, the main point I was making was that I got blindsided by
Audition's installation-default behavior when reading 32-bit files.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - Jim F. 11:19:10 12/15/09 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
