|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? posted by carcass93 on December 15, 2009 at 11:06:16:
Yes, I did, at least for 44.1 to 176.4k over many files.
44.1 to 96? Why? Unless your card doesn't work at 88.2/176.4k.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - fmak 11:11:44 12/15/09 (6)
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - Jim F. 11:42:00 12/15/09 (5)
- Can you pl explain why and the advanatges? - fmak 06:37:10 12/16/09 (3)
- RE: Can you pl explain why and the advanatges? - Jim F. 09:57:28 12/16/09 (1)
- There is an amusing thread. . . - Jim F. 10:33:50 12/16/09 (0)
- "This seems a complicated process chain......." - jeffmathers 07:58:46 12/16/09 (0)
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - fmak 21:57:12 12/15/09 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
