In Reply to: A nasty surprise in Adobe Audition posted by Jim F. on December 15, 2009 at 10:40:39:
I'm aware of what graphs show - but that's not what I personally heard on my system, for whatever reason, when playing with Audition 3.0.1 to upsample 16/44 to 24/96.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - carcass93 11:06:16 12/15/09 (8)
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - Jim F. 11:19:10 12/15/09 (0)
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - fmak 11:11:44 12/15/09 (6)
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - Jim F. 11:42:00 12/15/09 (5)
- Can you pl explain why and the advanatges? - fmak 06:37:10 12/16/09 (3)
- RE: Can you pl explain why and the advanatges? - Jim F. 09:57:28 12/16/09 (1)
- There is an amusing thread. . . - Jim F. 10:33:50 12/16/09 (0)
- "This seems a complicated process chain......." - jeffmathers 07:58:46 12/16/09 (0)
- RE: Did your listening tests confirm superiority of "No Pre/Post filter" setting? - fmak 21:57:12 12/15/09 (0)