RE: Sorry, can't concur--or at least not completely

Posted by profbrookes (A) on March 5, 2008 at 13:49:17

In Reply to: Sorry, can't concur--or at least not completely posted by DougE on March 5, 2008 at 13:15:09:

My own experiments agree with you.

I have tried a variety of cd and dvd players as transports too - only to find that they all sound very different - it actaully surprised me how different.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - keithfox 09:34:49 03/04/08 (14)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - petertg 14:52:55 04/30/08 (0)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - QuadESL63 07:42:16 03/12/08 (0)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - limono 05:28:56 03/06/08 (1)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - baka 02:30:07 03/07/08 (0)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - RGA 11:57:29 03/04/08 (9)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - DRCope 20:21:50 03/22/08 (0)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - GTCharlie 18:50:01 03/04/08 (7)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - Vincin 23:30:35 03/04/08 (6)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - andersen 08:11:54 03/08/08 (0)

Sorry, can't concur--or at least not completely - DougE 13:15:09 03/05/08 (2)

RE: Sorry, can't concur--or at least not completely - Response34 15:54:39 03/07/08 (0)

RE: Sorry, can't concur--or at least not completely - profbrookes 13:49:17 03/05/08 (0)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - keithfox 11:54:42 03/05/08 (0)

RE: Inexpensive transport for dac 2.1.. - richardcooper2k 06:12:14 03/05/08 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Sorry, can't concur--or at least not completely - profbrookes 13:49:17 03/05/08 (0)

RE: Sorry, can't concur--or at least not completely

Post a Message!