In Reply to: Re: Mr. Chip, final round? posted by jbmcb on May 25, 2005 at 10:37:32:
The chances that laser light being reflected off a room boundary remains coherent are zero. That's one cornerstone of Geoff's building which fails. He simply uses too many assumptions (leaky box, coherent light, EIT in solids). His building is way too fragile to withstand the slightest breeze.It would be interesting to know Johns' and Clark's opinion (both degreed physicists) on that explanation. Clark did not want accept me as partner in his bet, maybe because he knew that he would loose.
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Talking about odds - KlausR. 02:08:55 05/26/05 (4)
- it's probably a joke - tunenut 10:09:29 05/26/05 (3)
- Probably????nt.. - jneutron 10:30:17 05/26/05 (0)
- The Schrodinger's Cat Explaination - jbmcb 10:25:00 05/26/05 (1)
- Re: The Schrodinger's Cat Explaination - toxicport.e 16:40:43 06/02/05 (0)