In Reply to: RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) posted by Satie on November 12, 2017 at 12:43:57:
Hay again Satie,
With all the not absolutely sure of how it'll sound &/or last, maybe I should just go with orig'l Mag T-1D thin alum tweeter voice coil wire? Mag has responded via e-mail & said it's still available at $10/tweet panel. Also, my tweet panel upgrade will not be clam shelled glued back together. I'll be able to do future EZ access inspections & redoings. Think of all the reusable tweets in the trash since say 1980. Back then it was cost effective to replace with new ones, but not nowadays at $500USD+/pair.
Also, am I correct in thought that the extra 6 double voice coil runs in the bass panel centers are not for performance? It's done only to achieve the proper resistance/impedance? I see SMG's with double voice coil runs across the entire smaller diaphragm? If yes, shouldn't I do only single runs & add a good quality resistor adding up to the proper amount thereby reducing the diaphragm wt by say 20%?
Thanks very much again for your know how,
Steve S
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - steve.sukiennik 17:20:07 11/12/17 (26)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - Satie 21:31:28 11/12/17 (25)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - steve.sukiennik 17:44:10 12/03/17 (0)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - steve.sukiennik 15:57:02 11/20/17 (2)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - InfinityApogee 18:07:14 11/22/17 (1)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - steve.sukiennik 20:57:26 11/23/17 (0)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - Roger Gustavsson 22:43:09 11/12/17 (20)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - Satie 01:11:28 11/13/17 (19)
- RE: DIY Remylar Method (cont) - Roger Gustavsson 02:40:39 11/13/17 (18)
- Thanks, good to know (nt) - Satie 11:26:36 11/13/17 (17)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 09:41:16 11/29/17 (16)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - Satie 09:44:12 11/30/17 (15)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 13:51:15 11/30/17 (14)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - Satie 12:43:41 12/01/17 (13)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 06:15:51 12/03/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 14:43:19 12/02/17 (11)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - Satie 19:56:53 12/05/17 (8)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 00:22:32 12/07/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 22:46:52 12/05/17 (6)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - Satie 08:39:34 12/07/17 (2)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 22:19:37 12/07/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 17:07:29 12/07/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - InfinityApogee 23:23:43 12/05/17 (2)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 03:00:09 12/06/17 (1)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - Satie 07:52:41 12/07/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 16:13:47 12/02/17 (0)
- RE: Thanks, good to know (nt) - steve.sukiennik 16:00:48 12/02/17 (0)