In Reply to: RE: Maggie 3.7's vs 3.6's posted by Norman M on October 15, 2012 at 07:53:55:
Your criteria would disqualify HP's review in TAS and possibly JV's as well, food for thought. I've expressed my opinion on this subject previously. The 3.7 is an excellent speaker but only incrementally improved over the 3.6s. Then again I am 55.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Maggie 3.7's vs 3.6's - djcxxx 12:02:08 10/15/12 (1)
- RE: Maggie 3.7's vs 3.6's - JBen 13:13:12 10/15/12 (0)