![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Errrr exactly posted by dave c on December 11, 2004 at 14:03:49:
..well, point to point contact is an excellent form of 'isolation'. it reduces vibrational magnitude CONSIDERABLY, and is the true working principal of a roller ball.another principal is mass. adding mass also reduces vibrational magnitude.
think of it as more than just a 'path'. it's much more complex than that.
size and number of contacts is important as this relates to relative weight. mass is important, as is the number of poc's + where those are located, + that relates to time, and so on and so on.
another principal is that two coupled masses are now one. they share the v. magnitude; let's say the objects are of like mass; the magnitude is reduced by 1/2...
I personally do not like absorbative materials for coupling ["isolation"] purposes. they cause time smear; and in audio, that is never good. if it isolates say, more than it smears; yeah, it probably sounds better, but if you were to reduce the magnitude =ly, rigidy, it would sound better, I assure you.
fc
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: exactly - Fatcobra 15:35:30 12/11/04 (17)
- Problems - David Aiken 21:57:49 12/11/04 (14)
- Re: - Fatcobra 07:48:47 12/12/04 (13)
- Re: - David Aiken 11:53:58 12/12/04 (12)
- Re: prove it : )... - Fatcobra 12:17:19 12/12/04 (11)
- Re: prove it : )... - David Aiken 14:56:53 12/12/04 (5)
- I never said the ball was moving in 2 or more directions at the same time. NT - David Aiken 21:07:32 12/13/04 (0)
- A ball can only roll in one direction at a time, dude... nt - Fatcobra 04:12:48 12/13/04 (3)
- and your problem with that is? - dave c 12:48:57 12/13/04 (2)
- Re: you don't see the problem?...nt - Fatcobra 13:52:06 12/13/04 (1)
- what I don't see is your answer. nt - dave c 15:41:25 12/13/04 (0)
- mmmmm - dave c 12:47:38 12/12/04 (4)
- Re: mmmmm - Fatcobra 13:08:56 12/12/04 (3)
- Re: mmmmm - David Aiken 14:40:23 12/12/04 (2)
- Re: mmmmm - Fatcobra 14:48:17 12/12/04 (1)
- where did you study physics? - dave c 14:57:45 12/12/04 (1)
- mmmmmm - dave c 21:28:49 12/11/04 (1)
- Re: see #5 in my re to Dave A...nt - Fatcobra 08:54:16 12/12/04 (0)