![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Hear is what you said about carbon grease, Stu posted by Tweaker456 on May 9, 2014 at 14:50:27:
That's carbon grease and I still maintain that what I said holds true. Most audiophile conductive greases are colloidal solutions of either copper or silver, and are designed to fill on mating surface gaps with the higher conductivity metal.
Carbon is much higher in conductivity than the metals. YOU may like the effect, but I suspect you are hearing a smoothness caused by the carbon resistance. IF you like it, fine, it's no skin off my back.
There are many ways to skin a cat, so to speak, however.
George Cardas endorses Rhodium plating not because it has low resistance, but because rhodium is very hard and when plated has a very smooth surface. When a rhodium plated jack is mated with a rhodium plug, the two smooth surfaces makes a greater overall contact patch than a precious metal one, and thus lowers overall resistance. (No affiliation with Cardas, BTW, not even as a dealer).
Gold and silver ends and jacks being precious metals are extremely soft. The mating surfaces will gall upon insertion and thus reduce the contact patch, with the scraped material literally lifting the mating surfaces apart. With time, much of this will flatten out, and is perhaps one reason why there is "break in" on cables. You can check this yourself by simply twisting an IC end. The sound will change, usually brighter.
Conductive greases are made by those who recognize this issue. That being said, it is a band aide cure for a more fundamental issue.
I have advocated using Ford dielectric grease. Developed by Ford Motor Company, who places their on board computers under the hood, it seals the connectors and prevents corrosion from setting in. It is an insulated grease, however, and being a grease may be also lubricating the insertion process and reduce galling, in addition to reducing contamination and corrosion.
Again YMMV.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Hear is what you said about carbon grease, Stu - unclestu 15:56:08 05/09/14 (23)
- RE: Hear is what you said about carbon grease, Stu - Duster 17:37:00 05/09/14 (22)
- Some further thoughts on ends - unclestu 23:44:25 05/09/14 (19)
- RE: Some further thoughts on ends - Duster 18:00:56 05/11/14 (3)
- Wouldn't - unclestu 23:21:11 05/11/14 (2)
- RE: Wouldn't - Duster 08:52:49 05/12/14 (1)
- High - unclestu 22:49:00 05/12/14 (0)
- Enid Lunley was the ultimate tweaker/tinkerer - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 16:30:54 05/11/14 (3)
- Well-stated (nt) - Duster 17:51:15 05/11/14 (2)
- RE: Some further thoughts on Enid. - May Belt 23:11:30 05/11/14 (1)
- RE: Some further thoughts on Enid. - Duster 08:42:23 05/12/14 (0)
- RE: Some further thoughts on ends - Norman M 16:10:13 05/10/14 (7)
- RE: Some further thoughts on enid - May Belt 03:46:26 05/11/14 (6)
- RE: Some further thoughts on enid - Norman M 07:58:39 05/11/14 (5)
- Here's a scary thought - Jon Risch 19:51:33 05/11/14 (4)
- RE: Here's a scary thought - Norman M 08:48:42 05/12/14 (1)
- True story.... - unclestu 17:04:24 05/12/14 (0)
- After re-readingd some of her columns not long ago ... - Dave Pogue 05:01:07 05/12/14 (0)
- IIRC - unclestu 20:31:46 05/11/14 (0)
- RE: Remember Enid Lumley. - May Belt 05:45:47 05/10/14 (1)
- Enid - unclestu 14:50:48 05/10/14 (0)
- RE: Some further thoughts on ends - mehrdadb_gd 03:07:48 05/10/14 (0)
- As an aside - unclestu 19:42:14 05/09/14 (1)
- RE: Gold plating - beautox 16:18:50 05/10/14 (0)