![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Hah, you're on! posted by Sebrof on April 17, 2010 at 19:56:41:
In my original post I tried to explain how, when swapping the fuses back and forth, I ended up choosing one way over the other based on admittedly somewhat vague impressions. It's the case with any changes that I test. The proof comes in living with the sound for several days or more. Your impression is a far broader one and your more likely to identify the character of sound through the difference in mood, electricity, air pressure and so on.
After installing the first fuse the system was still going through burn-in changes of other tweaks I'd done on the power side, but there came a point where I was really happy. A couple weeks later the fuse blew and I put in another. I gave it time to burn in but, for two weeks or more, I was frustrated by certain aspects. I did the second test and, within several hours of settling on one direction, I was mucho happy, and still am mucho happy 2 weeks down the line.
And indeed it was 'almost unlistenable' because of the constant awareness that, not too long before, I had a sound that gave me much more pleasure and far fewer things to fault. Indeed, a case of audio nervosa it was...
I've just repeated what I'd written in the first post, haven't I? Oh well, guess it can't do any harm to try once again to convey that I, and others who have observed the phenomenon, are not batshit crazy. I've just added somewhere else in the thread that there has to be some crazy voodoo going on here, or at least some aspect of the science of electricity that humans have yet to touch on. All I know is that what I'm hearing is real and whether others choose to argue that point is, well, the reason why I get to repeat myself, hooray!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Hah, you're on! - Japesgalore 20:34:43 04/17/10 (40)
- RE: Hah, you're on! - Sebrof 07:12:23 04/18/10 (39)
- "Actually I believe it's the science of how our brains perceive the world around us, and it's very well known. - Norm 07:26:13 04/18/10 (36)
- RE: "Actually I believe it's the science of how our brains perceive the world around us, and it's very well kn - Sebrof 08:23:21 04/18/10 (35)
- Just out of curiosity... - unclestu 17:45:06 04/18/10 (21)
- RE: Just out of curiosity... - Sebrof 18:34:31 04/18/10 (20)
- Galileo. - unclestu 20:17:28 04/18/10 (19)
- Stu... - jbcortes 00:26:47 04/19/10 (6)
- Interesting - unclestu 01:56:06 04/19/10 (5)
- RE: Interesting - jbcortes 02:57:52 04/19/10 (4)
- regarding measurements - unclestu 14:33:18 04/21/10 (0)
- Everything you say up to a point I can agree with. - Norm 09:03:26 04/19/10 (2)
- RE: Everything you say up to a point I can agree with. - jbcortes 09:10:14 04/19/10 (1)
- No further comment is needed, especially after "speaks volumes!"nt - Norm 09:22:34 04/19/10 (0)
- RE: Galileo. - Sebrof 21:11:54 04/18/10 (11)
- And yet - unclestu 01:45:38 04/19/10 (10)
- Since you're mentionning wine, have you heard of the Brochet experiment? - jbcortes 06:54:55 04/19/10 (9)
- Too bad - unclestu 11:46:50 04/19/10 (8)
- We've both expressed our points, that's fine - jbcortes 13:37:16 04/19/10 (7)
- Don't know - unclestu 18:34:28 04/19/10 (6)
- RE: Don't know - jbcortes 23:34:30 04/19/10 (5)
- Sheesh! - unclestu 13:43:22 04/21/10 (4)
- Fine then! - jbcortes 13:50:06 04/21/10 (3)
- "make me believe that it does" - unclestu 15:55:53 04/21/10 (0)
- Seems to me - unclestu 15:45:19 04/21/10 (1)
- RE: Seems to me - jbcortes 00:06:05 04/22/10 (0)
- You don't know anything about science. And to state that something is impossible is evidence of this. nt - Norm 09:20:08 04/18/10 (12)
- Actually Sebrof is absolutely right (nt) - jbcortes 09:57:24 04/18/10 (11)
- Only if you want to believe we know everything about nature's laws. - Norm 15:10:17 04/18/10 (10)
- RE: Only if you want to believe we know everything about nature's laws. - Sebrof 16:33:06 04/18/10 (9)
- I stand by my posting that you are too quick to judgment about what science knows. - Norm 18:03:24 04/18/10 (8)
- The problem here... - jbcortes 00:19:05 04/19/10 (7)
- I hear a difference when I don't know which is in. What is your conclusion? - Norm 08:50:33 04/19/10 (6)
- I say it's totally meaningless unless validated by a blind test - jbcortes 09:00:29 04/19/10 (5)
- All that I can say is that your statement is totally meaningless to me & invalid. - Norm 09:19:55 04/19/10 (4)
- Pity - jbcortes 09:48:01 04/19/10 (3)
- With your condescension you should expect an angry retort. - Norm 12:54:06 04/19/10 (2)
- RE: With your condescension you should expect an angry retort. - jbcortes 13:45:46 04/19/10 (1)
- I see no value in even a "good" blind test and am surprised that you do, but hey we all do what we want. nt - Norm 10:01:38 04/21/10 (0)
- RE: Hah, you're on! - Japesgalore 07:25:08 04/18/10 (1)
- RE: Hah, you're on! - Sebrof 14:58:13 04/18/10 (0)