![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: With all due respect… posted by Vvw on May 7, 2009 at 05:49:57:
Two things about the Cathedral Panels. In my experience:
1. They "kick in" at the frequencies where there are standing waves in the given room. Standing wave frequencies will depend primarily on dimensions of the room. The waterfall plot referenced in the previous posts exhibited standing waves below 40hZ, and so this is where the "after" plot showed improvement. This is called out in the text next to the waterfall plots.
2. They are very good children in the sense that they play well with others. They are complementary with other acoustic treatment products, whether this is traditional absorbing panels and traps, or diffusers, or three other products I find useful: the Shakti Hallographs, Synergistic Research Acoustic ART, and the old RoomLens.
For someone looking for an all out room-tuning, acoustical solution they are not a be-all, end-all product, but because they work on standing waves, and at the deepest bass frequencies, often the most difficult acoustic areas to address and requiring the most and biggest traditional "traps," they are a very good place to start. And if someone is only going to do one thing in a room, or isn't willing/able to fill the room with other types of acoustic treatments, this is a good, domestically acceptable "50% solution" where there is no prospect for going for 100% all out acoustic treatment.
I just think this is a very good and innovative product.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: With all due respect… - Robo02 11:18:52 05/07/09 (19)
- "They "kick in" at the frequencies where there are standing waves in the given room" - David Aiken 13:17:58 05/07/09 (1)
- RE: "They "kick in" at the frequencies where there are standing waves in the given room" - Ethan Winer 14:42:01 05/07/09 (0)
- RE: With all due respect… - Ethan Winer 12:26:16 05/07/09 (16)
- RE: With all due respect… - Robo02 15:12:18 05/08/09 (15)
- "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - David Aiken 16:20:15 05/08/09 (14)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - Ethan Winer 12:43:47 05/09/09 (13)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - David Aiken 13:38:28 05/09/09 (12)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - Ethan Winer 09:44:40 05/10/09 (11)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - David Aiken 13:43:11 05/10/09 (10)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - Ethan Winer 12:36:12 05/11/09 (9)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - Robo02 14:56:27 05/11/09 (8)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - Ethan Winer 12:37:55 05/12/09 (6)
- RE: "I heard them in the lab room at my company's factory..." - Robo02 11:46:08 05/13/09 (5)
- RE: "I heard them in the lab room at my company's factory..." - Ethan Winer 12:47:34 05/13/09 (4)
- RE: "I heard them in the lab room at my company's factory..." - Robo02 12:10:51 05/15/09 (3)
- RE: "I heard them in the lab room at my company's factory..." - Ethan Winer 09:59:09 05/16/09 (2)
- RE: "I heard them in the lab room at my company's factory..." - Robo02 14:52:07 05/18/09 (1)
- RE: "I heard them in the lab room at my company's factory..." - Ethan Winer 12:02:01 05/19/09 (0)
- RE: "their size is the equivilent of the size of the opening when a standard door is open one inch." - David Aiken 23:59:50 05/11/09 (0)