In Reply to: Remastering quality might matter more than rez numbers... posted by peppy m. on December 20, 2024 at 15:43:58:
So, a "better sounding" version of any original recording does not always give away the secrets to it's successes, right ?for which I have a number of comparisons: the same content in vinyl, 44/16 and 88/24 (or better). And not ones for which there are hundreds of variations. While the age and genre of the music varies, my observations are pretty much consistent for each set of differences.
Vinyl sacrifices low end and dynamics for more transparent top. Redbook reverses those benefits. High rez digital does it all.
Edits: 12/20/24
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Interesting question - E-Stat 16:12:19 12/20/24 (6)
- RE: Interesting question - Tre' 07:54:28 12/22/24 (5)
- Same master - E-Stat 07:58:51 12/22/24 (4)
- I would love to get my hands on those. - Tre' 14:30:34 12/22/24 (3)
- The qualities I hear - E-Stat 15:35:19 12/22/24 (2)
- What do you think you are hearing ? - peppy m. 17:35:13 12/22/24 (1)
- Partially, yes - E-Stat 17:40:42 12/22/24 (0)