|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
Register / Login
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? posted by TomLarson on March 2, 2007 at 11:26:05:
Less robust than redbook when damaged, though, so not for the masses.But I would think that after 20+ years, a disc design that is both simple to extract bit-perfect data, but having some added redundancy to cover physical damage, would be possible. Imagine what you could do, for instance with a DVD disk with 4.5GB of data storage? It would be trivial to take a 660MB music CD's data and place multiple copies of file sectors all over the thing, so that it would take some real catastrophe to make even a single bit non-recoverable.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Data discs? - J.Mac 02:46:43 03/03/07 (35)
- Wrong assumption - Charles Hansen 14:57:16 03/03/07 (33)
- Ok, then... - J.Mac 16:39:09 03/03/07 (32)
- Jitter... [nt] - Ted Smith 16:57:32 03/03/07 (31)
- Re: Jitter... [nt] - Charles Hansen 19:07:48 03/03/07 (0)
- Jitter at what point in the chain? - J.Mac 17:49:03 03/03/07 (29)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 21:13:44 03/03/07 (28)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 08:12:00 03/04/07 (27)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Todd Krieger 12:31:23 03/12/07 (0)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 08:31:53 03/04/07 (25)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 10:16:29 03/04/07 (24)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 11:53:17 03/04/07 (23)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 12:37:58 03/04/07 (22)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 12:42:49 03/04/07 (21)
- We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 15:41:44 03/04/07 (9)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 16:06:11 03/04/07 (8)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 16:50:26 03/04/07 (6)
- Secret Jitter Path - John Swenson 17:25:20 03/05/07 (0)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 17:03:28 03/04/07 (4)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 18:56:57 03/04/07 (3)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 19:43:51 03/04/07 (2)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 21:15:11 03/04/07 (1)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 21:35:44 03/04/07 (0)
- Well spotted! - Christine Tham 16:36:13 03/04/07 (0)
- Logic induced modulation and jitter - Christine Tham 13:34:36 03/04/07 (10)
- Here are some other random jitter related pages - Ted Smith 14:17:46 03/04/07 (7)
- This is not a bad link, and not too technical - Christine Tham 14:20:32 03/04/07 (6)
- Nobody seems to take jitter seriously unless there is math in the paper :) [nt] - Ted Smith 14:31:18 03/04/07 (5)
- A question - Christine Tham 15:01:57 03/04/07 (4)
- Re: A question - Ted Smith 15:10:07 03/04/07 (3)
- Re: A question - Christine Tham 15:26:26 03/04/07 (2)
- Re: A question - Ted Smith 16:13:26 03/04/07 (1)
- Hey, nobody said it was going to be easy - which is why I'm not volunteering to design it :-) (nt) - Christine Tham 16:21:06 03/04/07 (0)
- Yep - Ted Smith 13:48:53 03/04/07 (1)
- Re: Yep - Christine Tham 14:17:23 03/04/07 (0)
- That seems like a good idea!!! nt - TomLarson 08:32:27 03/03/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
