In Reply to: Re: It's "Muttersprache" to begin with... posted by clarkjohnsen on March 26, 2005 at 08:51:11:
you admit that I was right when I said that the disc has to spin. Nice. Just wanted to get that sorted out.Because it means, whatever the working principle of that chip is, that it has something to do with a spinning disv, that it would not work on a stationary disc. Perhaps the chip establishes some magic link to the disc's TOC.
But no, I can not imagine a working principle other than said magic. No, wait, it's quantum computing. The chip reads the disc TOC, recognizes the incorrect data, the quantum computer is activated by daylight, tells the machine how to avoid the wrong data. But alas, I see an obstacle here, how does the chip communicate with the TOC? Drat, wrong direction.
Any idea yourself?
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A first step in the good direction... - KlausR. 11:12:40 03/26/05 (9)
- The dics does NOT have to spin. Can't you get that out of your head? - clarkjohnsen 11:38:09 03/26/05 (8)
- Re: The dics does NOT have to spin. Oh really? - KlausR. 21:29:37 03/26/05 (7)
- I certainly have a VERY healthy skepticism about the IC but I think - sjb 11:19:24 04/02/05 (2)
- You're right... - KlausR. 05:38:51 04/03/05 (0)
- "Of course no one can explain how..." And your proof of that sweeping statement, is...? - clarkjohnsen 20:58:55 04/02/05 (0)
- "But what I did not get was answers." I have told you repeatedly... - clarkjohnsen 08:51:03 03/28/05 (3)
- Re: "But what I did not get was answers." I have told you repeatedly... - Mudcat 04:04:40 03/29/05 (1)
- Otherwise [Clark] would fess up that he does not actually know how the chip works. LOL! - clarkjohnsen 20:56:46 04/02/05 (0)
- No reply from JSMR (yet), no explanation from you, ...John Curl remains silent... - KlausR. 09:55:47 03/28/05 (0)