In Reply to: Why do you say I haven't read it? posted by E-Stat on November 1, 2006 at 06:21:06:
He doesn't come up with a "sole" criterion.For example, what does he say about long wires?
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I said you need to read it AGAIN. - Pat D 07:10:48 11/01/06 (27)
- The impedance chart is qualified with asterisks for lengths over fifty feet - E-Stat 07:26:28 11/01/06 (26)
- One ordinarily reads the TEXT in articles, too. - Pat D 11:55:28 11/01/06 (25)
- Ok - E-Stat 12:55:55 11/01/06 (24)
- Re: Ok - Pat D 14:14:38 11/01/06 (23)
- I think you missed my question - E-Stat 15:11:29 11/01/06 (16)
- Re: I think you missed my question - Pat D 20:26:26 11/01/06 (15)
- Still missing my question - E-Stat 06:22:16 11/02/06 (14)
- Nonsense. - Pat D 08:26:47 11/02/06 (13)
- I'm simply asking for you to complete discussing your opinion - E-Stat 09:01:41 11/02/06 (12)
- Re: I'm simply asking for you to complete discussing your opinion - Pat D 12:14:48 11/02/06 (10)
- Worrying about cables? - E-Stat 13:00:34 11/02/06 (9)
- Re: Worrying about cables? - Pat D 14:49:59 11/02/06 (8)
- I already knew the answer - E-Stat 15:26:24 11/02/06 (7)
- Re: I already knew the answer - Pat D 20:08:02 11/02/06 (6)
- Sure - E-Stat 06:36:02 11/03/06 (5)
- No DBTs? No replication? And so old! - Pat D 09:39:23 11/03/06 (4)
- Me ask for DBT proof? - E-Stat 10:12:15 11/03/06 (3)
- Wrong model. - Pat D 18:25:36 11/03/06 (2)
- I thought you had the originals (nt) - E-Stat 18:35:43 11/03/06 (1)
- Nope. I liked the ESL-63 better. - Pat D 22:08:32 11/06/06 (0)
- Re: I'm simply asking for you to complete discussing your opinion - thetubeguy1954 10:55:58 11/02/06 (0)
- Re: Ok - andy19191 14:34:40 11/01/06 (5)
- What did scientists think - E-Stat 16:12:35 11/01/06 (4)
- Re: What did scientists think - andy19191 01:04:53 11/02/06 (3)