In Reply to: More About Roger Russell's New Speakers. posted by thetubeguy1954 on October 31, 2006 at 06:38:22:
This issue is brought up in regards to McIntosh demonstrations in Mr. Russell's article on "Speaker Wire, A History," which can be found on his site at the link below. You will note that he has a pretty good idea under what conditions differences in speaker cables are likely to be audible.Since he doesn't claim that the special cables make an audible difference, I have no particular problem with it. After all, McIntosh was in the business of selling electronics and speakers and to do that to some extent one must provide the customers what they want. I do wish for a buying public knowledgeable enough that using prestigious wire would not be necessary. And McIntosh did try to educate people.
I have discussed this issue before on AR, and possibly it has been brought up before on this site.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: More About Roger Russell's New Speakers. - Pat D 18:15:54 10/31/06 (32)
- Re: More About Roger Russell's New Speakers. - Soundmind 05:33:37 11/01/06 (0)
- Please enlighten us - E-Stat 18:54:36 10/31/06 (30)
- I think you'd better read the article again before you make statements about his opinions. - Pat D 06:06:15 11/01/06 (29)
- Why do you say I haven't read it? - E-Stat 06:21:06 11/01/06 (28)
- I said you need to read it AGAIN. - Pat D 07:10:48 11/01/06 (27)
- The impedance chart is qualified with asterisks for lengths over fifty feet - E-Stat 07:26:28 11/01/06 (26)
- One ordinarily reads the TEXT in articles, too. - Pat D 11:55:28 11/01/06 (25)
- Ok - E-Stat 12:55:55 11/01/06 (24)
- Re: Ok - Pat D 14:14:38 11/01/06 (23)
- I think you missed my question - E-Stat 15:11:29 11/01/06 (16)
- Re: I think you missed my question - Pat D 20:26:26 11/01/06 (15)
- Still missing my question - E-Stat 06:22:16 11/02/06 (14)
- Nonsense. - Pat D 08:26:47 11/02/06 (13)
- I'm simply asking for you to complete discussing your opinion - E-Stat 09:01:41 11/02/06 (12)
- Re: I'm simply asking for you to complete discussing your opinion - Pat D 12:14:48 11/02/06 (10)
- Worrying about cables? - E-Stat 13:00:34 11/02/06 (9)
- Re: Worrying about cables? - Pat D 14:49:59 11/02/06 (8)
- I already knew the answer - E-Stat 15:26:24 11/02/06 (7)
- Re: I already knew the answer - Pat D 20:08:02 11/02/06 (6)
- Sure - E-Stat 06:36:02 11/03/06 (5)
- No DBTs? No replication? And so old! - Pat D 09:39:23 11/03/06 (4)
- Me ask for DBT proof? - E-Stat 10:12:15 11/03/06 (3)
- Wrong model. - Pat D 18:25:36 11/03/06 (2)
- I thought you had the originals (nt) - E-Stat 18:35:43 11/03/06 (1)
- Nope. I liked the ESL-63 better. - Pat D 22:08:32 11/06/06 (0)
- Re: I'm simply asking for you to complete discussing your opinion - thetubeguy1954 10:55:58 11/02/06 (0)
- Re: Ok - andy19191 14:34:40 11/01/06 (5)
- What did scientists think - E-Stat 16:12:35 11/01/06 (4)
- Re: What did scientists think - andy19191 01:04:53 11/02/06 (3)