In reference to the fact that I use about 10 feet of 16 gauge speaker cable for the left speaker and about 23 or so feet of 12 gauge cable for the right speaker, yes, I have used similar lengths of 12 gauge speaker cable for for both channels at times. However, I do not need anything like that length for the left channel, and it's a PITA to have to coil up the wire, much less to snake it (and what on earth would I want to do that for?). I did not wish to cut up the 12 gauge cable since I might need that length if we changed the location of the speakers. So I went down to Canadian Tire and got 50 feet of 16 gauge wire and cut off about 10 feet for the left channel. 16 gauge wire is so much easier to work with than 12 gauge is, too.I have never noticed any difference in the sound either way that could be due to the speaker cables. With my current main speakers, which I have only had for a couple of weeks, I have only used the present configuration and really, I see no reason to try the other unless we change the equipment around again.
I have nothing against overkill in audio equipment, and actually, my speaker cables are already better than they need to be.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Answer to Ted Smith's last question - Pat D 18:12:42 06/03/06 (63)
- Re: Answer to Ted Smith's last question - tomservo 10:09:29 06/04/06 (2)
- Re: Answer to Ted Smith's last question - Ted Smith 00:27:07 06/07/06 (0)
- Re: Answer to Ted Smith's last question - Pat D 15:01:51 06/04/06 (0)
- Not trying to be a PITA, but - Ted Smith 23:47:12 06/03/06 (59)
- Re: Not trying to be a PITA, but - jneutron 08:07:44 06/05/06 (55)
- What am I missing? - Ted Smith 06:15:23 06/10/06 (5)
- Re: What am I missing? - jneutron 06:34:06 06/13/06 (4)
- Re: What am I missing? - Ted Smith 10:56:15 06/13/06 (3)
- Ummm, this.. - jneutron 11:54:50 06/13/06 (2)
- Re: Ummm, this.. - Ted Smith 12:58:49 06/13/06 (1)
- Re: Ummm, this.. - jneutron 13:46:01 06/13/06 (0)
- Hi John! - Pat D 10:28:45 06/05/06 (48)
- Re: Hi John! - jneutron 10:59:27 06/05/06 (47)
- Thanks John! - Pat D 13:25:50 06/05/06 (46)
- Interesting conclusion - E-Stat 16:48:41 06/05/06 (45)
- Re: Interesting conclusion - Dan Banquer 17:46:43 06/05/06 (6)
- Quite simple, Dan - E-Stat 18:48:20 06/05/06 (5)
- Re: Quite simple, Dan - jneutron 09:28:18 06/06/06 (1)
- Answers - E-Stat 09:38:06 06/06/06 (0)
- I expected superficial.................. - Dan Banquer 02:58:21 06/06/06 (2)
- Re: I expected superficial.................. - Pat D 07:39:48 06/06/06 (1)
- Re: I expected superficial.................. - Dan Banquer 07:51:28 06/06/06 (0)
- Another unsupported ad hominem attack. Why am I not surprised? - Pat D 17:33:34 06/05/06 (37)
- Unsupported? - E-Stat 18:51:06 06/05/06 (36)
- I already did. Didn't you read the thread before coming up with irrelevant ad hominem allegation? (nt) - Pat D 20:06:33 06/05/06 (35)
- I read your exact words. Is that the problem? - E-Stat 10:06:31 06/06/06 (34)
- Why should I wire my system to satisfy you? - Pat D 12:50:27 06/06/06 (33)
- No reason at all - E-Stat 13:36:53 06/06/06 (5)
- Hold your head in a vise? - E-Stat 20:26:34 06/08/06 (3)
- Re: Hold your head in a vise? - Pat D 05:37:10 06/09/06 (0)
- The Asylum had a big brain fart today... I noticed about 20 blank posts in the fora I follow. [nt] - Ted Smith 20:32:02 06/08/06 (1)
- I saw posts in other forums as well (nt) - E-Stat 06:28:35 06/09/06 (0)
- So you want me to hold my head in a vice? - Pat D 09:20:41 06/08/06 (0)
- Timing in wire????? - real_jj 13:22:28 06/06/06 (26)
- Re: Timing in wire????? - jneutron 13:39:52 06/06/06 (25)
- Re: Timing in wire????? - andy_c 16:34:51 06/06/06 (3)
- Re: Timing in wire????? - jneutron 06:17:27 06/07/06 (2)
- Reference for LTRA - andy_c 10:16:51 06/07/06 (1)
- Re: Reference for LTRA - jneutron 11:13:59 06/07/06 (0)
- That's probably more significant... - real_jj 14:11:31 06/06/06 (20)
- Transmission lines....he he...hmmm - jneutron 06:09:29 06/07/06 (16)
- Well, yes, but .... - real_jj 12:54:22 06/09/06 (13)
- Re: Well, yes, but .... - jneutron 08:59:51 06/12/06 (12)
- Well, no... - real_jj 12:35:37 06/13/06 (11)
- Re: Well, no... - jneutron 13:51:11 06/13/06 (10)
- phase distortion - real_jj 20:10:02 06/13/06 (9)
- Re: phase distortion - jneutron 06:25:15 06/14/06 (8)
- Well, actually, a fourier transform HAS to be able to detect them all... - real_jj 19:11:39 06/14/06 (7)
- Re: Well, actually, a fourier transform HAS to be able to detect them all... - jneutron 13:08:47 06/15/06 (6)
- Ahh, I see what you mean... there's a math error. - real_jj 13:41:14 06/15/06 (5)
- Re: Ahh, I see what you mean... there's a math error. - jneutron 14:02:41 06/15/06 (4)
- Yes, but you're missing the point.... - real_jj 14:30:30 06/15/06 (3)
- Actually, it's far more interesting than that - jneutron 06:23:52 06/16/06 (2)
- Well, I can only suggest that you look at each waveform in a simulation... - real_jj 14:22:56 06/16/06 (1)
- been there, done that. - jneutron 05:49:18 06/19/06 (0)
- You a power engineer??? - real_jj 11:00:21 06/09/06 (1)
- relatively speaking. - jneutron 08:22:03 06/12/06 (0)
- Does that mean I have to hold my head in a vise? - Pat D 17:25:59 06/06/06 (2)
- Only if it's a very, very accurate, rigid vice. :) - real_jj 18:28:13 06/06/06 (1)
- Re: Only if it's a very, very accurate, rigid vice. :) - Pat D 15:21:30 06/10/06 (0)
- Re: Not trying to be a PITA, but - Pat D 15:44:06 06/04/06 (2)
- Thanks [nt] - Ted Smith 00:18:53 06/07/06 (1)
- You're welcome! - Pat D 15:48:20 06/08/06 (0)