|
Pro Audio Asylum Pro studio recording equipment and music production/industry. |
|
|
|
Pro Audio Asylum Pro studio recording equipment and music production/industry. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards posted by Marantzguy on May 12, 2006 at 10:48:22:
As you rightly pointed out recording in 24bit gives you more headroom and you are less likely to trip your limiter, which is always a good thing.
It also gives you a couple of bits at the bottom where digital noise 'collects' and leaves you a clean 16bit 'window' for your signal...
As for sampling frequency I would use 88.2kHz since higher sample rates produce audibly better treble, even after conversion, and simply halving it requires substantially less number crunching when you eventually dither to 16/44.1.This is just my opinion based on a little practical experience, so please don't nail me technicalities...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards - b.l.zeebub 07:58:03 05/14/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
