In Reply to: Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards posted by Bersani on May 11, 2006 at 22:51:14:
Hi, Anthony!Much thanks for your very helpful analysis and suggestions!
In fact, I did edit and re-eq/normalize and added limiting to the recording in the 24/96 domain and then burned a Red Book copy for the client.
My understanding was that at certain high resolution (in this case, 24/96), there would be some sort of an advantage regarding possible headroom. I failed to also mention that the two-channel recording involved a pair of Milab microphones set in figure-of-eight pattern going through an Aphex 1100 with the mic lim circuit activated. Even so, it was necessary to tweak the eq a bit and then normalize before yielding a standard Red Book burn.
Thanks again!
Richard Links
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards - Marantzguy 10:48:22 05/12/06 (3)
- Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards - Inmate51 15:09:04 05/16/06 (0)
- Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards - b.l.zeebub 07:58:03 05/14/06 (0)
- Re: Recording at high-resolution, dithering to Red Book Standards - Bersani 21:00:02 05/12/06 (0)