In Reply to: RE: 24/192 is not the end all be all posted by ForgotPassword on October 12, 2009 at 02:45:15:
having tried the upsampling in many different players. Some have sounded dreadful to me; a few are very tempting but ultimately less enjoyable. I've used several soundcards and dacs, but that's not what I'm talking about. To anyone who has been exclusively using player-upsampling for a long time, I'd suggest several weeks without the media player upsampling before comparing again the upsampled v. non. Addictive - not like narcotics, but maybe on the level of sugar-addiction!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- bypassing media player upsampling, - seger 04:58:40 10/12/09 (15)
- RE: bypassing media player upsampling, - AstroD 23:08:51 10/12/09 (1)
- RE: bypassing media player upsampling, - seger 01:53:09 10/13/09 (0)
- Just get 192/24 recordings and play them as is. nt - Tony Lauck 08:53:41 10/12/09 (8)
- RE: Just get 192/24 recordings and play them as is. nt - seger 12:32:02 10/12/09 (0)
- RE: Just get 192/24 recordings and play them as is. nt - fmak 09:15:18 10/12/09 (6)
- RE: Just get 192/24 recordings and play them as is. nt - Tony Lauck 09:43:12 10/12/09 (4)
- RE: Just get 192/24 recordings and play them as is. nt - fmak 10:15:38 10/12/09 (3)
- Detecting faked hi-res from upsampled 44/16 - Tony Lauck 10:47:29 10/12/09 (1)
- RE: Detecting faked hi-res from upsampled 44/16 - fmak 21:56:12 10/12/09 (0)
- RE: Just get 192/24 recordings and play them as is. nt - Dynaudio_Rules 10:32:12 10/12/09 (0)
- RE: Just get 192/24 recordings and play them as is. nt - Dynaudio_Rules 09:24:54 10/12/09 (0)
- RE: bypassing media player upsampling, - Dynaudio_Rules 05:51:47 10/12/09 (3)
- RE: bypassing media player upsampling, - seger 12:10:57 10/12/09 (2)
- RE: bypassing media player upsampling, - Dynaudio_Rules 18:01:31 10/13/09 (0)
- RE: bypassing media player upsampling, - Tony Lauck 19:45:19 10/12/09 (0)