In Reply to: RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... posted by fmak on February 17, 2021 at 08:31:55:
"we know this from years of measurements of digital and analogue equipment"Who is we? If this would be a hard and reliable fact we wouldn't have these discussions over and over again.
Is there any evidence supporting your position?
Any papers, tools, specifications - real world tests or examples?I am not challenging you - this is no attack! I'd seriously like to see where all this written to get it all sorted. And I think that we are on the same page in believing that these standard audio measurements won't get us the full picture.
But. To be able to cope with these wanna-be-scientists, we need to get some meat on the bones.
Edits: 02/18/21
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... - soundchekk 00:38:30 02/18/21 (7)
- RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... - fmak 04:30:26 02/18/21 (6)
- RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... - soundchekk 05:24:31 02/18/21 (5)
- RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... - fmak 05:39:02 02/18/21 (4)
- RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... - Ryelands 09:32:16 02/18/21 (0)
- RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... - soundchekk 05:53:34 02/18/21 (2)
- RE: Should be "Do USB filters make DACs MEASURE bette?r"... - fmak 08:03:38 02/18/21 (0)
- "I am pretty sure you can measure what we hear" In practice, no - Dave_K 07:26:58 02/18/21 (0)