RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct?

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Iczerman 14:23:31 03/03/21 (54)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - rogerh113 06:30:20 03/12/21 (2)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - pictureguy 18:08:51 04/05/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 07:30:31 03/12/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - the Glyph 14:55:43 03/10/21 (10)

I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - Bill Fitzmaurice 05:06:11 03/11/21 (9)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - the Glyph 12:43:21 03/11/21 (8)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - Bill Fitzmaurice 12:58:54 03/11/21 (7)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - pictureguy 17:18:19 04/06/21 (4)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - Tre' 17:24:31 04/06/21 (3)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - pictureguy 18:05:56 04/06/21 (2)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:14:44 04/06/21 (1)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - pictureguy 20:54:47 04/06/21 (0)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - the Glyph 14:10:43 03/11/21 (1)

RE: I can hear where 80 to 100hz sounds are located. - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:11:09 03/11/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - KanedaK 04:22:17 03/06/21 (0)

Of course you can locate sound at 400 hz Fat in the zone for human hunters - Edp 16:37:17 03/05/21 (4)

RE: Of course you can locate sound at 400 hz Fat in the zone for human hunters - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:21:11 03/05/21 (3)

This is not a difficult to prove false issue Easy to prove at home for anybody - Edp 10:10:39 03/06/21 (2)

RE: This is not a difficult to prove false issue Easy to prove at home for anybody - Bill Fitzmaurice 10:55:11 03/06/21 (1)

So your saying folks don't try experiment at home because ? - Edp 16:48:51 03/06/21 (0)

Be very thankful for that. - peppy m. 08:55:09 03/05/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - hahax@verizon.net 20:43:07 03/03/21 (16)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - claudej1@aol.com 09:54:24 03/04/21 (11)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Ivan303 15:02:57 03/04/21 (10)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 15:05:13 03/04/21 (9)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - hahax@verizon.net 19:48:16 03/04/21 (6)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 05:09:34 03/05/21 (5)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - claudej1@aol.com 16:38:05 03/06/21 (4)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:18:27 03/06/21 (3)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - kyle 11:55:03 03/09/21 (2)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 12:19:34 03/09/21 (1)

While OT - E-Stat 13:57:45 03/19/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Ivan303 15:45:51 03/04/21 (1)

That is one BEAUTIFUL SPEAKER. Always wanted them!. --nt - Coner 19:44:23 03/04/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Hornlover 08:12:28 03/04/21 (3)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 08:39:36 03/04/21 (2)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - hahax@verizon.net 19:50:05 03/04/21 (1)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 05:23:11 03/05/21 (0)

Is Paul Klipsch correct? Yes. - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:09:45 03/03/21 (10)

RE: "The radiation pattern of the KHorn...is at least 180 degrees"--no. - Cask05 06:04:49 03/21/21 (2)

RE: "The radiation pattern of the KHorn...is at least 180 degrees"--no. - Bill Fitzmaurice 07:39:38 03/21/21 (1)

RE: "The radiation pattern of the KHorn...is at least 180 degrees"--no. - Cask05 07:58:51 03/21/21 (0)

RE: and yet.... - Retsel 11:31:12 03/10/21 (5)

RE: and yet.... - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:14:45 03/11/21 (0)

RE: and yet.... - Retsel 22:54:02 03/10/21 (3)

RE: and yet.... - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:20:05 03/11/21 (2)

RE: and yet.... - Retsel 08:50:09 03/12/21 (1)

RE: and yet.... - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:59:50 03/12/21 (0)

RE: Is Paul Klipsch correct? Yes. - Iczerman 10:58:00 03/05/21 (0)

The Klipschorn was designed as a mono speaker. - viridian 16:06:47 03/03/21 (2)

RE: The Klipschorn was designed as a mono speaker. - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:26:00 03/03/21 (1)

Precisely my point. nt - viridian 19:39:51 03/03/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Tre' 15:36:06 03/03/21 (0)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - pictureguy 15:20:25 03/03/21 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - hahax@verizon.net 19:50:05 03/04/21 (1)

RE: No imaging below 450 HZ? Is Paul Klipsch correct? - Bill Fitzmaurice 05:23:11 03/05/21 (0)

Post a Message!