|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: RE: Well, it's certainly easy to condemn something one has never heard posted by stehno on December 9, 2017 at 16:57:09:
I'm glad to give it some time and listening. And to hear what those who can compare the MQA version to native high res versions have to say as well.
I wouldn't expect the difference to be obvious in every case, but in some cases anyway, there was a glaringly obvious improvement.
From what I know, much of the engineering behind it is sound, but other aspects raise alarms, e.g., the loss of bit depth. The analog noise floor isn't what matters here -- it's well established that we can hear a correlated signal below the noise floor. On the other hand, few if any commercial recordings take advantage of a full 24-bit dynamic range.
In any case, I don't understand the hysteria that MQA has elicited. If it improves the sound overall, I'm all for it. And only listening can tell us that.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Well, it's certainly easy to condemn something one has never heard - josh358 17:06:24 12/09/17 (4)
- RE: Well, it's certainly easy to condemn something one has never heard - Dave_K 05:51:45 12/10/17 (3)
- RE: Well, it's certainly easy to condemn something one has never heard - josh358 18:01:48 12/11/17 (2)
- RE: Well, it's certainly easy to condemn something one has never heard - Jim Austin 11:27:05 12/12/17 (1)
- RE: Well, it's certainly easy to condemn something one has never heard - josh358 06:46:03 12/13/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
