RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ?

Posted by GTCharlie (A) on December 7, 2007 at 17:00:35

In Reply to: RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? posted by RhythMick on December 7, 2007 at 02:42:50:

the SRPP 5687 just barely drives the 300B final. An option is to parallel the 5687, cathode follower, ala the later Andy Grove designs. But then the 6SN7 might not be able to provide enough voltage to the parallel 5687 ... whatever. Just experiment.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - RhythMick 01:43:16 12/07/07 (13)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - Donald North 21:49:41 12/07/07 (1)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - richardcooper2k 04:28:08 12/08/07 (0)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - richardcooper2k 03:28:27 12/07/07 (4)

7044 should sub for 5687, too (nt) - SteveBrown 06:37:24 12/12/07 (0)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - RhythMick 03:29:31 12/09/07 (2)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - GTCharlie 17:35:34 12/09/07 (1)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - RhythMick 00:59:02 12/10/07 (0)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - Vincin 02:07:39 12/07/07 (5)

Works fine - SteveBrown 06:43:44 12/12/07 (0)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - RhythMick 02:42:50 12/07/07 (3)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - GTCharlie 17:00:35 12/07/07 (2)

No need to experiment - limono 19:24:55 12/10/07 (1)

RE: No need to experiment - RhythMick 01:11:38 12/11/07 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ? - GTCharlie 17:00:35 12/07/07 (2)

No need to experiment - limono 19:24:55 12/10/07 (1)

RE: No need to experiment - RhythMick 01:11:38 12/11/07 (0)

RE: SRPP/5687 - love it or hate it ?

Post a Message!