|
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
|
|
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: Class D Audio Feedback posted by Aaron 01 on February 15, 2014 at 14:23:25:
A few quotes:"I thought my Clayton M300 Class A amps displayed better decay and note development, particularly in the high frequencies but also down into the mids resulting in a somewhat better sense of venue and space."
"Specifically, the speakers were easier to listen to. The TAD/TAD was very harsh and glaring. Not so with the Bel Canto."
"The mids and highs are a bit soft to my ears, with absolutely no hint of digital harshness.
Detail and articulation is slightly less than my tube amps."So here it goes: class D is still behind class A (or even AB) when it comes to microdetail and resolution in the upper part of the spectrum. I've listened to Jeff Rowland - not cheap by any budget - and still found them missing in those critical (I mean, critical for me) areas.
OTOH, I have nothing against switching power supplies, as long as HF rejection is properly engineered.
Edits: 03/06/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Class D Audio Feedback - iosiP 16:50:11 03/06/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
