In Reply to: RE: It's the 12th thread on the page, titled "Why not Planar speakers?" (no text) posted by Hi-Fi Nut on September 21, 2010 at 05:39:33:
OK, thanks.
I read the thread and one thing that struck me is that with a $60,000 budget, the only Maggie that could possibly interest him was the 20.1. So people who might have recommended the 1.7 or 3.6 may have been less likely to do so.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: It's the 12th thread on the page, titled "Why not Planar speakers?" (no text) - josh358 10:46:55 09/21/10 (14)
- One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - audiozorro 11:47:14 09/21/10 (13)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - josh358 12:31:00 09/21/10 (12)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - kentaja 14:58:34 09/21/10 (11)
- I'm not shocked at all that some people just live for status - audiozorro 15:43:34 09/21/10 (3)
- RE: I'm not shocked at all that some people just live for status - kentaja 16:33:03 09/21/10 (2)
- RE: I'm not shocked at all that some people just live for status - esande 17:47:38 09/21/10 (1)
- I could handle a bit more as well! - kentaja 20:08:24 09/21/10 (0)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - josh358 15:13:08 09/21/10 (6)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - kentaja 16:16:43 09/21/10 (5)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - Satie 04:49:03 09/22/10 (1)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - kentaja 07:03:56 09/22/10 (0)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - josh358 18:19:58 09/21/10 (2)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - kentaja 20:20:43 09/21/10 (1)
- RE: One thing that struck me is too was the $60,000 budget - josh358 06:02:39 09/22/10 (0)