In Reply to: RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow posted by TheGoodCaptain on March 24, 2008 at 07:51:21:
Well, the only "wild claim" I can recall from PG was early on when he said the MMG bass capability was increased. I can't remember exactly how he worded it.
In any case, that is simply not physically possible because the motor system is completely unchanged. It's certainly possible/probable that the subjective bass QUALITY was improved.
I think part of the problem here is the premise that opinions are invalid if a person hasn't had first hand experience (listened) to the speaker. That's the easy way out of any discussion. Playing the subjective card immediately pisses off some folks (including me) that like to look at the entire picture and not just the listening aspect.
Dave.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - Davey 08:08:18 03/24/08 (42)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - BFitz 17:46:27 03/24/08 (1)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - Davey 21:13:41 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - TheGoodCaptain 08:33:30 03/24/08 (39)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - Davey 08:53:31 03/24/08 (38)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - TheGoodCaptain 09:32:21 03/24/08 (37)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - Davey 10:01:53 03/24/08 (36)
- Dave...run while you can.... :) nt - jjcarr 10:07:14 03/24/08 (35)
- What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 10:08:42 03/24/08 (34)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - jjcarr 10:10:49 03/24/08 (33)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 10:22:33 03/24/08 (32)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 11:14:48 03/24/08 (31)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 11:29:36 03/24/08 (30)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Dawnrazor 11:36:47 03/24/08 (29)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Peter Gunn 13:03:43 03/24/08 (6)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 13:32:19 03/24/08 (4)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 13:36:20 03/24/08 (3)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 13:57:14 03/24/08 (2)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 14:33:20 03/24/08 (1)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 15:00:25 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - jjcarr 13:29:12 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 12:51:19 03/24/08 (21)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 15:03:43 03/24/08 (20)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 15:30:29 03/24/08 (19)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 15:45:48 03/24/08 (18)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 16:58:48 03/24/08 (5)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 18:33:06 03/24/08 (4)
- Wow... - Rod H. 18:24:23 03/28/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 20:26:46 03/24/08 (2)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 21:00:03 03/24/08 (1)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - MaggieLover 22:00:20 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 16:06:35 03/24/08 (11)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Peter Gunn 16:58:07 03/24/08 (10)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 18:08:52 03/24/08 (3)
- fair square - Peter Gunn 07:25:43 03/26/08 (2)
- RE: fair square - MaggieLover 17:01:22 03/26/08 (0)
- RE: fair square - Davey 14:38:39 03/26/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Planar Owner 18:02:53 03/24/08 (5)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Peter Gunn 06:00:44 03/25/08 (1)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 06:34:53 03/25/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 05:58:19 03/25/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - TheGoodCaptain 18:38:59 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: What's that supposed to mean? - Davey 18:36:48 03/24/08 (0)