Home Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Planar Speaker Asylum ]
[ Alert Moderator ]

RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow

"Well, the only "wild claim" I can recall from PG was early on when he said the MMG bass capability was increased. I can't remember exactly how he worded it.
In any case, that is simply not physically possible because the motor system is completely unchanged. It's certainly possible/probable that the subjective bass QUALITY was improved."

I don't post here much, but when I see something like this, I need to respond.

Since when did the motor system wholly dictate bass transducer performance?

For one thing, a change in the dipole baffle dimensions, making it have more area, would certainly translate to changes in dipole bass performance. Both theoretical, and measured. It's not only physically possible, it's a sure thing, and follows well known principles of acoustics. You can download free dipole prediction software, enter dimensions, and play all day long to understand the impact of baffle dimensions and bass response. Next "wild claim"?

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  The Cable Cooker  

Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
FAQ

Post a Message!

 Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.

[ Top Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]