In Reply to: RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow posted by Davey on March 24, 2008 at 08:08:18:
"Well, the only "wild claim" I can recall from PG was early on when he said the MMG bass capability was increased. I can't remember exactly how he worded it.
In any case, that is simply not physically possible because the motor system is completely unchanged. It's certainly possible/probable that the subjective bass QUALITY was improved."
I don't post here much, but when I see something like this, I need to respond.
Since when did the motor system wholly dictate bass transducer performance?
For one thing, a change in the dipole baffle dimensions, making it have more area, would certainly translate to changes in dipole bass performance. Both theoretical, and measured. It's not only physically possible, it's a sure thing, and follows well known principles of acoustics. You can download free dipole prediction software, enter dimensions, and play all day long to understand the impact of baffle dimensions and bass response. Next "wild claim"?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - BFitz 17:46:27 03/24/08 (1)
- RE: Peter Gunn and the World of Tomorrow - Davey 21:13:41 03/24/08 (0)