 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.227.195.99
In Reply to: RE: Still no answer to my questions (NT) posted by unclestu on January 28, 2013 at 16:29:02
Nt
Follow Ups:
after all I gave a synopsis of what I was told, You elected not to believe me, I didn't tape their replies, you know.... I consiedr that question answered. So where's my answers?
Stu
You actually scrupulously avoided telling me your theory or what they told you. Nice try.
that your theory was that the shape of the disc made all the difference, citing different bevels and such. I detect absolutely no change from disc to disc in the physical shape and wrote so. You claim to have reverse engineered the disc. I see no product of your engineering.
So essentially i see no support for your theory, if indeed you even had one. Why should I be any different from you?
No I didn't state that. I said that the way the disc was cut, including beveling and the physical dimensions of the disc, as well as how the disc was oriented top to bottom and azimuth was what was important. Not to mention where the disc was placed. Maybe you should keep a running logbook so you don't have to rely on your memory. I also said I agree with the Shun Mook explanation of sympathetic resonance. I assume you have some other theory, one you seem reticent to divulge, can't say I blame you.
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
